ArticleOncology letters2024
Prognostic and diagnostic effects of high serum midkine levels in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Oncology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serum Midkine as a Biomarker for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment Response and Prognostication.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2026Article
- Rewiring immunity: Midkine's emerging role in cancer immune escape and drug resistance.iScience · 2026Review
- Association between the preoperative Midkine (+)/CEA (+) level and poor prognosis in colorectal cancer patients.Surgery today · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Midkine (MK) is a soluble cytokine, and its serum levels strongly correspond to protein expression levels in tumors. The present study aimed to clarify the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of serum MK (s-MK) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Serum samples were obtained before surgery from 123 patients with HCC who had undergone surgery between January 2012 and December 2020. The receiver operating characteristic curve revealed that the best cut-off value for s-MK in differentiating HCC from healthy cases was 426 pg/ml. The clinicopathological variables and overall survival of patients were compared between the s-MK-positive group and s-MK-negative group. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of s-MK were 82.1, 97.4 and 88.0%, respectively. An s-MK-positive status was significantly associated with the number of tumors (≥2). The positivity rate of s-MK was significantly higher compared with that of α-fetoprotein and protein-induced by vitamin K absence-II. In total, only 28% of the patients were positive for s-MK. The s-MK-positive group showed significantly worse overall survival compared with the s-MK-negative group. Moreover, multivariate analysis revealed that an s-MK-positive status was independently associated with poor prognosis. s-MK was useful in detecting early HCC. The findings of this study indicated that the s-MK-positive status is associated with the number of tumors and can act as an independent prognostic risk factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.