ArticleBioinformatics advances2024
Non-Negative matrix factorization combined with kernel regression for the prediction of adverse drug reaction profiles.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- PHENOCAUZ: Linking Human Symptoms, Drug Side Effects and Efficacy to Their Molecular Causes Using Mendelian Disease Biology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A scoping review of artificial intelligence applications in clinical trial risk assessment.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Post-market unexpected Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) are associated with significant costs, in both financial burden and human health. Due to the high cost and time required to run clinical trials, there is significant interest in accurate computational methods that can aid in the prediction of ADRs for new drugs. As a machine learning task, ADR prediction is made more challenging due to a high degree of class imbalance and existing methods do not successfully balance the requirement to detect the minority cases (true positives for ADR), as measured by the Area Under the Precision-Recall (AUPR) curve with the ability to separate true positives from true negatives [as measured by the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) curve]. Surprisingly, the performance of most existing methods is worse than a naïve method that attributes ADRs to drugs according to the frequency with which the ADR has been observed over all other drugs. The existing advanced methods applied do not lead to substantial gains in predictive performance. Results: We designed a rigorous evaluation to provide an unbiased estimate of the performance of ADR prediction methods: Nested Cross-Validation and a hold-out set were adopted. Among the existing methods, Kernel Regression (KR) performed best in AUPR but had a disadvantage in AUROC, relative to other methods, including the naïve method. We proposed a novel method that combines non-negative matrix factorization with kernel regression, called VKR. This novel approach matched or exceeded the performance of existing methods, overcoming the weakness of the existing methods. Availability: Code and data are available on https://github.com/YezhaoZhong/VKR.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.