Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38736649›Full record

ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2023

TEAM: A MULTIPLE TESTING ALGORITHM ON THE AGGREGATION TREE FOR FLOW CYTOMETRY ANALYSIS.

John A Pura, Xuechan Li, Cliburn Chan, Jichun Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John A PuraCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans AfFaIRS MediCal Center, Durham, NC 27701.
Xuechan LiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27705.
Cliburn ChanDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27705.
Jichun XieDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27705.

Funding

Social and Behavioral Sciences CoreP30AI064518 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Nwora Lance Okeke · 2005 to 2026
$50.5M
Integrated Biostatistical Training for CVD ResearchT32HL079896 · NHLBI · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Sean M O'Brien, Ana-Maria Staicu · 2006 to 2026
$4.1M
New computational methods to dynamically pinpointing the subregions carrying disease-associated rare variantsR01HG012555 · NHGRI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI XIE, JICHUN · 2022 to 2025
$1.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG012555NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL079896NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201700061CNIAID NIH HHS P30 AI064518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In immunology studies, flow cytometry is a commonly used multivariate single-cell assay. One key goal in flow cytometry analysis is to detect the immune cells responsive to certain stimuli. Statistically, this problem can be translated into comparing two protein expression probability density functions (pdfs) before and after the stimulus; the goal is to pinpoint the regions where these two pdfs differ. Further screening of these differential regions can be performed to identify enriched sets of responsive cells. In this paper, we model identifying differential density regions as a multiple testing problem. First, we partition the sample space into small bins. In each bin, we form a hypothesis to test the existence of differential pdfs. Second, we develop a novel multiple testing method, called TEAM (Testing on the Aggregation tree Method), to identify those bins that harbor differential pdfs while controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) under the desired level. TEAM embeds the testing procedure into an aggregation tree to test from fine- to coarse-resolution. The procedure achieves the statistical goal of pinpointing density differences to the smallest possible regions. TEAM is computationally efficient, capable of analyzing large flow cytometry data sets in much shorter time compared with competing methods. We applied TEAM and competing methods on a flow cytometry data set to identify T cells responsive to the cytomegalovirus (CMV)-pp65 antigen stimulation. With additional downstream screening, TEAM successfully identified enriched sets containing monofunctional, bifunctional, and polyfunctional T cells. Competing methods either did not finish in a reasonable time frame or provided less interpretable results. Numerical simulations and theoretical justifications demonstrate that TEAM has asymptotically valid, powerful, and robust performance. Overall, TEAM is a computationally efficient and statistically powerful algorithm that can yield meaningful biological insights in flow cytometry studies.

Indexed as

aggregation treedistribution differencefalse discovery proportion (FDP)Flow cytometrymultiple testing

Identifiers

PMID38736649
PMCPMC11083434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.