Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38736607›Full record

ArticleJournal of human kinetics2024

Energy System Contributions in Repeated Sprint Tests: Protocol and Sex Comparison.

Erkan Tortu, Tahir Hazir, Ayse Kin-Isler

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07737327 (The Acute Effects of Individually Timed Sodium Citrate Ingestion on Repeated Sprint Performance in Professional Female Soccer Players), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07737327 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Acute Effects of Individually Timed Sodium Citrate Ingestion on Repeated Sprint Performance in Professional Female Soccer Players: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorHacettepe UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled20ConditionsExercise-Induced Fatigue, Athletic Performance, SoccerArmsSodium Citrate Oral Product, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Locomotion-specific metabolic demands in 30-s anaerobic efforts.Journal of exercise science and fitness · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erkan TortuFaculty of Sport Sciences, Department of Coaching Education, Trabzon University, Trabzon, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org0000-0003-2816-9994
Tahir HazirFaculty of Sport Sciences, Department of Exercise and Sport Sciences, Division of Training and Movement Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org0000-0002-0048-0281
Ayse Kin-IslerFaculty of Sport Sciences, Department of Exercise and Sport Sciences, Division of Training and Movement Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org0000-0001-9651-2067

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the energy system contributions to different repeated sprint protocols and also to determine sex-related differences in these contributions. Sixteen men and fourteen women team sport athletes randomly performed two cycling repeated sprint protocols with the same total duration (10 x 6 s and 6 x 10 s). Relative peak power (RPP), relative mean power (RMP), performance decrement (PD), oxygen uptake (VO

Indexed as

aerobic systemalactic energy systemglycolysisteam sports

Identifiers

PMID38736607
PMCPMC11079935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.