Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38736524›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2024

Association between the use of oral contraceptives and the occurrence of systemic hypertension: A systematic review with statistical comparison between randomized clinical trial interventions.

Ingrid Soares de Souza, Gabriel Zorello Laporta, Juliana Zangirolami-Raimundo, Isabel Cristina Esposito Sorpreso, Heloisa Carla Lopes Silva Dos Santos, José Maria Soares Júnior, Rodrigo Daminello Raimundo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Quarterly injectable hormonal contraceptive does not increase the activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in women without cardiovascular risk factors.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ingrid Soares de SouzaLaboratório de Delineamento de Estudos e Escrita Científica, Centro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gabriel Zorello LaportaLaboratório de Delineamento de Estudos e Escrita Científica, Centro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, São Paulo, Brazil.
Juliana Zangirolami-RaimundoLaboratório de Delineamento de Estudos e Escrita Científica, Centro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, São Paulo, Brazil.
Isabel Cristina Esposito SorpresoLaboratório de investigação médica em ginecologia estrutural e molecular, Disciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, São Pauloṭ, Brazil.
Heloisa Carla Lopes Silva Dos SantosLaboratório de Delineamento de Estudos e Escrita Científica, Centro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, São Paulo, Brazil.
José Maria Soares JúniorLaboratório de investigação médica em ginecologia estrutural e molecular, Disciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, São Pauloṭ, Brazil.
Rodrigo Daminello RaimundoLaboratório de Delineamento de Estudos e Escrita Científica, Centro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In the WHO eligibility criteria, there is agreement that hypertensive women taking Oral Contraceptive Hormonal Combined (OCHC) may be at increased risk of cardiovascular disease. The risk-to-benefit ratio hinges on the severity of the condition. While a mild increase in blood pressure is a common occurrence in consumers of OCHC, the potential for developing high blood pressure exists during oral contraceptive use. Consequently, there is a possibility of increased cardiovascular risk, with limited available data on this issue. Objective: To evaluate the potential effects of OCHC on blood pressure through a systematic review with statistical analysis of existing randomized controlled trials. Method: This systematic review with statistical comparison adheres to the recommendations outlined in the PRISMA (Principal Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. The analysis strategy involves comparing the mean difference in blood pressure change according to the type of treatment, in addition to the calculation of clinically relevant outcomes (CRO). Results: Our findings suggest a clinically relevant outcome related to the increase in blood pressure in users of ethinyl estradiol combined with gestodene in a cyclic regimen over 6 months. Conversely, a decrease in blood pressure was observed among users of ethinyl estradiol combined with chlormadinone over 24 months of usage. Conclusion: While our study found minor variations in blood pressure across varying forms of oral contraceptives, these differences are not significant enough to warrant specific clinical recommendations. However, the results suggest that individuals with hypertension should exercise caution with ethinyl estradiol, particularly when administered cyclically alongside gestodene, due to the potential risk of increased blood pressure. Additionally, the use of oral contraceptives containing ethinyl estradiol paired with chlormadinone acetate or ethinyl estradiol combined with drospirenone may be more suitable for individuals at a high risk of developing hypertension.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraceptivesHigh PressureHypertensionOral

Identifiers

PMID38736524
PMCPMC11088268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.