Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38736496›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2024

Development and validation of a deep learning-based model to predict response and survival of T790M mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients in early clinical phase trials using electronic medical record and pharmacokinetic data.

Ning Lou, Xinge Cui, Xinyuan Lin, Ruyun Gao, Chi Xu, Nan Qiao, Ji Jiang, Lu Wang, Weicong Wang, Shanbo Wang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ning Lou *Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xinge Cui *Clinical Pharmacology Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Drug, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical PK & PD Investigation for Innovative Drugs, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xinyuan LinLaboratory of Health Intelligence, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Ruyun GaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, Beijing, China.
Chi XuLaboratory of Health Intelligence, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Nan QiaoLaboratory of Health Intelligence, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Ji JiangClinical Pharmacology Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Drug, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical PK & PD Investigation for Innovative Drugs, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Lu WangClinical Pharmacology Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Drug, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical PK & PD Investigation for Innovative Drugs, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Weicong WangClinical Pharmacology Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Drug, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical PK & PD Investigation for Innovative Drugs, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Shanbo WangHangzhou ACEA Pharmaceutical Research Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China.
Wei ShenHangzhou ACEA Pharmaceutical Research Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China.
Xin ZhengClinical Pharmacology Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Drug, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical PK & PD Investigation for Innovative Drugs, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xiaohong HanClinical Pharmacology Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Drug, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical PK & PD Investigation for Innovative Drugs, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor ( Methods: We utilized the electronic medical record (EMR) and pharmacokinetic parameters of 326 T790M-mutated NSCLC patients, including 283 patients treated with Abivertinib in phase I (n=177, for training) and II (n=106, for validation) clinical trials and an additional validation cohort 2 comprising 43 patients treated with BPI-7711. Furthermore, 18 patients underwent whole-exome sequencing for biological interpretation of CoxMoE. We evaluated the predictive performance for therapeutic response using the area under the curve (AUC) and the Concordance index (C-index) for progression-free survival (PFS). Results: CoxMoE exhibited AUCs of 0.73-0.83 for predicting efficacy defined by best overall response (BoR) and achieved C-index values of 0.64-0.65 for PFS prediction in training and validating cohorts. The PFS of 198 patients with a low risk [median, 6.0 (range, 1.0-23.3) months in the abivertinib treated cohort; median 16.5 (range, 1.4-27.4) months in BPI-7711 treated cohort] of being non-responder increased by 43% [hazard ratio (HR), 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.40-0.78; P=0.0013] and 50% (HR, 0; 95% CI, 0-0; P=0.01) compared to those at high-risk [median, 4.2 (range, 1.0-35) months in the abivertinib treated cohort; median, 11.0 (range, 1.4-25.1) months in BPI-7711 treated cohort]. Additionally, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), creatinine clearance (Ccr), monocyte, and steady-state plasma trough concentration utilited to construct model were found significantly associated with drug resistance and aggressive tumor pathways. A robust correlation was observed between APTT and Ccr with PFS (log-rank test; P<0.01) and treatment response (Wilcoxon test; P<0.05), respectively. Conclusions: CoxMoE offers a valuable approach for patient selection by forecasting therapeutic response and PFS utilizing laboratory tests and pharmacokinetic parameters in the setting of early-phase clinical trials. Simultaneously, CoxMoE could predict the efficacy of third-generation EGFR-TKI non-invasively for T790M-positive NSCLC patients, thereby complementing existing EGFR genotype detection.

Indexed as

Deep learningearly clinical phase trialprognosis predictionthird-generation EGFR-TKI

Identifiers

PMID38736496
PMCPMC11082707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.