ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2024
Diffusion in Porous Rock Is Anomalous.
Article in Environmental science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-Function Sol-Gel Antibacterial Materials with Biphasic Octenidine Release for Decontamination and Long-Term Protection.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Rebuttal to Correspondence on "Diffusion in Porous Rock Is Anomalous".Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular diffusion of chemical species in subsurface environments─rock formations, soil sediments, marine, river, and lake sediments─plays a critical role in a variety of dynamic processes, many of which affect water chemistry. We investigate and demonstrate the occurrence of anomalous (non-Fickian) diffusion behavior, distinct from classically assumed Fickian diffusion. We measured molecular diffusion through a series of five chalk and dolomite rock samples over a period of about two months. We demonstrate that in all cases, diffusion behavior is significantly different than Fickian. We then analyze the results using a continuous time random walk framework that can describe anomalous diffusion in heterogeneous porous materials such as rock. This methodology shows extreme long-time tailing of tracer advance as compared to conventional Fickian diffusion processes. The finding that distinct anomalous diffusion occurs ubiquitously implies that diffusion-driven processes in subsurface zones should be analyzed using tools that account for non-Fickian diffusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.