ArticleMutagenesis2024
Impact of DNA ligase inhibition on the nick sealing of polβ nucleotide insertion products at the downstream steps of base excision repair pathway.
Article in Mutagenesis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA ligase (LIG) I and IIIα finalize base excision repair (BER) by sealing a nick product after nucleotide insertion by DNA polymerase (pol) β at the downstream steps. We previously demonstrated that a functional interplay between polβ and BER ligases is critical for efficient repair, and polβ mismatch or oxidized nucleotide insertions confound the final ligation step. Yet, how targeting downstream enzymes with small molecule inhibitors could affect this coordination remains unknown. Here, we report that DNA ligase inhibitors, L67 and L82-G17, slightly enhance hypersensitivity to oxidative stress-inducing agent, KBrO3, in polβ+/+ cells more than polβ-/- null cells. We showed less efficient ligation after polβ nucleotide insertions in the presence of the DNA ligase inhibitors. Furthermore, the mutations at the ligase inhibitor binding sites (G448, R451, A455) of LIG1 significantly affect nick DNA binding affinity and nick sealing efficiency. Finally, our results demonstrated that the BER ligases seal a gap repair intermediate by the effect of polβ inhibitor that diminishes gap filling activity. Overall, our results contribute to understand how the BER inhibitors against downstream enzymes, polβ, LIG1, and LIGIIIα, could impact the efficiency of gap filling and subsequent nick sealing at the final steps leading to the formation of deleterious repair intermediates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.