Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38735940›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2024

Dental biomaterials redefined: molecular docking and dynamics-driven dental resin composite optimization.

Ravinder S Saini, Rayan Ibrahim H Binduhayyim, Vishwanath Gurumurthy, Abdulkhaliq Ali F Alshadidi, Lujain Ibrahim N Aldosari, Abdulmajeed Okshah, Mohamed Saheer Kuruniyan, Doni Dermawan, Anna Avetisyan, Seyed Ali Mosaddad and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Molecular pain
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ravinder S SainiDepartment of Dental Technology, COAMS, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Rayan Ibrahim H BinduhayyimDepartment of Dental Technology, COAMS, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Vishwanath GurumurthyDepartment of Dental Technology, COAMS, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulkhaliq Ali F AlshadidiDepartment of Dental Technology, COAMS, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Lujain Ibrahim N AldosariDepartment of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulmajeed OkshahDepartment of Dental Technology, COAMS, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed Saheer KuruniyanDepartment of Dental Technology, COAMS, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Doni DermawanApplied Biotechnology, Faculty of Chemistry, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland.
Anna AvetisyanDepartment of Therapeutic Stomatology, Faculty of Stomatology, Yerevan State Medical University after Mkhitar Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia.
Seyed Ali MosaddadDepartment of Research Analytics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. mosaddad.sa@gmail.com.
Artak HeboyanDepartment of Research Analytics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. heboyan.artak@gmail.com.

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research, King Khalid University RGP2/475/45
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDental resin-based composites are widely recognized for their aesthetic appeal and adhesive properties, which make them integral to modern restorative dentistry. Despite their advantages, adhesion and biomechanical performance challenges persist, necessitating innovative strategies for improvement. This study addressed the challenges associated with adhesion and biomechanical properties in dental resin-based composites by employing molecular docking and dynamics simulation.

methodsMolecular docking assesses the binding energies and provides valuable insights into the interactions between monomers, fillers, and coupling agents. This investigation prioritizes SiO

resultsSiO

conclusionThese findings provide valuable insights into optimizing dental composites tailored to diverse clinical requirements. While EBPADMA-SiO

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsComposite ResinsMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationSilicon DioxideAcrylic ResinsDental MaterialsMethacrylatesPolyethylene GlycolsPolymethacrylic AcidsPolyurethanesAcrylic ResinsBiocompatible MaterialsComposite Dental ResinComposite ResinsDental MaterialsMethacrylatesPolyethylene GlycolsPolymethacrylic AcidsPolyurethanesSilicon Dioxidetriethylene glycol dimethacrylateBiomaterialDental resin compositeIn silicoMolecular dockingMolecular dynamics

Identifiers

PMID38735940
PMCPMC11089745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.