Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38735911›Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2024

Prognostic significance and immune landscape of a cell cycle progression-related risk model in bladder cancer.

Zhouting Tuo, Yuan Lin, Ying Zhang, Liang Gao, Dexin Yu, Jiani Wang, Chenyu Sun, Xianchao Sun, Jinyou Wang, Apurwa Prasad and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Construction of M2 macrophage-related gene signature for predicting prognosis and revealing different immunotherapy response in bladder cancer patients.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Zhouting Tuo *Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Yuan Lin *Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Ying ZhangDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Liang GaoCenter for Clinical Medicine, Huatuo Institute of Medical Innovation (HTIMI), Berlin, Germany.
Dexin YuDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Jiani WangInstitute for Social Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin; Berlin Institute of Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Berlin, Germany.
Chenyu SunDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Xianchao SunDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Jinyou WangDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Apurwa PrasadParkview Regional Medical Center, 11109 Parkview Plaza Dr, Fort Wayne, IN, 46845, USA.
Nimarta BheeshamInternal Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine, One Illini Drive, Peoria, IL, 61605, USA.
Muzi MengUK Program Site, American University of the Caribbean School of Medicine, Vernon Building Room 64, Sizer St, Preston, PR1 1JQ, UK.
Zhengmei LvDepartment of Histology and Embryology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China. lvzhengmeiayd@163.com.
Xin ChenDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China. chenxin704679314@163.com.

Funding

Basic and clinic collaborate research improvement plan of Anhui medical university 2020xkjT039Research Fund of Anhui Institute of translational medicine 2022zhyx-C45
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA greater emphasis has been placed on the part of cell cycle progression (CCP) in cancer in recent years. Nevertheless, the precise connection between CCP-related genes and bladder cancer (BCa) has remained elusive. This study endeavors to establish and validate a reliable risk model incorporating CCP-related factors, aiming to predict both the prognosis and immune landscape of BCa.

methodsClinical information and RNA sequencing data were collected from the GEO and TCGA databases. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to construct a risk model associated with CCP. The performance of the model was assessed using ROC and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. Functional enrichment analysis was employed to investigate potential cellular functions and signaling pathways. The immune landscape was characterized using CIBERSORT algorithms. Integration of the risk model with various clinical variables led to the development of a nomogram.

resultsTo build the risk model, three CCP-related genes (RAD54B, KPNA2, and TPM1) were carefully chosen. ROC and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis confirm that our model has good performance. About immunological infiltration, the high-risk group showed decreased levels of regulatory T cells and dendritic cells coupled with increased levels of activated CD4 + memory T cells, M2 macrophages, and neutrophils. Furthermore, the nomogram showed impressive predictive power for OS at 1, 3, and 5 years.

conclusionThis study provides new insights into the association between the CCP-related risk model and the prognosis of BCa, as well as its impact on the immune landscape.

Indexed as

Bladder cancerCell cycle progressionImmune landscapeNomogramPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID38735911
PMCPMC11089032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.