Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38735740›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of reproduction and development2024

Lower developmental potential of rat zygotes produced by ooplasmic injection of testicular spermatozoa versus cauda epididymal spermatozoa.

Misuzu Ide, Ibuki Saito, Makoto Sanbo, Mito Kanatsu-Shinohara, Takashi Shinohara, Masumi Hirabayashi, Shinichi Hochi

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Misuzu IdeGraduate School of Science and Technology, Shinshu University, Nagano 386-8567, Japan.
Ibuki SaitoGraduate School of Science and Technology, Shinshu University, Nagano 386-8567, Japan.
Makoto SanboNational Institute for Physiological Sciences, Aichi 444-8787, Japan.
Mito Kanatsu-ShinoharaGraduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
Takashi ShinoharaGraduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
Masumi HirabayashiNational Institute for Physiological Sciences, Aichi 444-8787, Japan.
Shinichi HochiGraduate School of Science and Technology, Shinshu University, Nagano 386-8567, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is clinically used to treat obstructive/nonobstructive azoospermia. This study compared the efficacy of ICSI with cauda epididymal and testicular sperm in Wistar (WI) and Brown-Norway (BN) rats. The transfer of ICSI oocytes with cryopreserved epididymal and testicular WI sperm resulted in offspring production of 26.2% and 3.7%-4.7%, respectively (P < 0.05). Treatments for artificial oocyte activation (AOA) and acrosome removal improved pronuclear formation in BN-ICSI oocytes; however, only AOA treatment was effective in producing offspring (3.7%-6.5%). In the case of ICSI with testicular sperm (TESE-ICSI), one offspring (0.6%) was derived from the BN-TESE-ICSI oocytes. The application of AOA or a hypo-osmotic sperm suspension did not improve the production of TESE-ICSI offspring. Thus, outbred WI rat offspring can be produced by using ICSI and less efficiently by using TESE-ICSI. Challenges in producing offspring by using ICSI/TESE-ICSI in inbred BN strain require further investigation.

Indexed as

EpididymisRats, WistarSpermatozoaSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicTestisZygoteAnimalsCryopreservationFemaleMaleOocytesPregnancyRatsArtificial oocyte activationCauda epididymal spermRat ICSITesticular sperm

Identifiers

PMID38735740
PMCPMC11310386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.