ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2024
Bayesian network models identify cooperative GPCR:G protein interactions that contribute to G protein coupling.
Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protein Frustration Reveals Orthosteric and Allosteric Active Sites in GPCR:G Protein Complexes.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Conserved residues in the Gα interface show subtype specificity in Gβγ coupling.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
- Computer-aided structural modeling and drug discovery for G-protein-coupled receptors in the age of artificial intelligence.Current opinion in structural biology · 2026Review
- DRUMBEAT temporally resolved interpretable machine learning model for characterizing state transitions in protein dynamics.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Allostery between Distant Structural Regions Dictates Selectivity in GPCR:G Protein Coupling.Biochemistry · 2026Article
- Conserved Residues in the Gα interface show subtype specificity in Gβγ coupling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Temporally resolved and interpretable machine learning model of GPCR conformational transition.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive 4-layeredCurrent pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025Article
- BaNDyT: Bayesian Network modeling of molecular Dynamics Trajectories.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cooperative interactions in protein-protein interfaces demonstrate the interdependency or the linked network-like behavior and their effect on the coupling of proteins. Cooperative interactions also could cause ripple or allosteric effects at a distance in protein-protein interfaces. Although they are critically important in protein-protein interfaces, it is challenging to determine which amino acid pair interactions are cooperative. In this work, we have used Bayesian network modeling, an interpretable machine learning method, combined with molecular dynamics trajectories to identify the residue pairs that show high cooperativity and their allosteric effect in the interface of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) complexes with Gα subunits. Our results reveal six GPCR:Gα contacts that are common to the different Gα subtypes and show strong cooperativity in the formation of interface. Both the C terminus helix5 and the core of the G protein are codependent entities and play an important role in GPCR coupling. We show that a promiscuous GPCR coupling to different Gα subtypes, makes all the GPCR:Gα contacts that are specific to each Gα subtype (Gαs, Gαi, and Gαq). This work underscores the potential of data-driven Bayesian network modeling in elucidating the intricate dependencies and selectivity determinants in GPCR:G protein complexes, offering valuable insights into the dynamic nature of these essential cellular signaling components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.