Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38735234›Full record

ArticleApplied ergonomics2024

Revealing complex interdependencies in surgical instrument reprocessing using SEIPS 101 tools.

Gabriel C Segarra, Ken Catchpole, Michael F Rayo, Sudeep Hegde, Christine Jefferies, Jeffrey Woodward, Kevin Taaffe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied ergonomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gabriel C SegarraMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States. Electronic address: segarra@musc.edu.
Ken CatchpoleMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Michael F RayoThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Sudeep HegdeClemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.
Christine JefferiesThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Jeffrey WoodwardMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Kevin TaaffeClemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.

Funding

Human Factors and Systems Integration in High Technology Surgery (HF-SIgHTS)R01HS026491 · AHRQ · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI ANGER, JENNIFER TASH, CATCHPOLE, KEN · 2018 to 2022
$2.0M
System Optimization for Advances in Sterile ProcessingR01HS027912 · AHRQ · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI CATCHPOLE, KEN, RAYO, MICHAEL F. · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS026491AHRQ HHS R01 HS027912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sterile Processing Departments (SPDs) must clean, maintain, store, and organize surgical instruments which are then delivered to Operating Rooms (ORs) using a Courier Network, with regular coordination occurring across departmental boundaries. To represent these relationships, we utilized the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) 101 Toolkit, which helps model how health-related outcomes are affected by healthcare work systems. Through observations and interviews which built on prior work system analyses, we developed a SEIPS 101 journey map, PETT scan, and tasks matrices to represent the instrument reprocessing work system, revealing complex interdependencies between the people, tools, and tasks occurring within it. The SPD, OR and Courier teams are found to have overlapping responsibilities and a clear co-dependence, with critical implications for the successful functioning of the whole hospital system.

Indexed as

Equipment ReuseOperating RoomsSurgical InstrumentsHumansPatient SafetySterilizationSystems AnalysisTask Performance and AnalysisSEIPS 101Sterile processingSurgery

Identifiers

PMID38735234
PMCPMC11194015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.