Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38734867›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2024

Medication errors in emergency departments: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and severity.

Phuong Thi Lan Nguyen, Thu Anh Thi Phan, Van Bich Ngoc Vo, Nhi T N Ngo, Ha Thi Nguyen, Toi Lam Phung, Mai Thi Tuyet Kieu, Thao Huong Nguyen, Khanh N C Duong

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Emergency department nurses' knowledge and practices related to extravasation injuries of non-cytotoxic medications.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Phuong Thi Lan NguyenSchool of Medicine, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Thu Anh Thi Phan *School of Medicine, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Van Bich Ngoc VoSchool of Medicine, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nhi T N NgoHealth Technology Assessment Program, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ha Thi NguyenSchool of Medicine, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Toi Lam PhungHealth Strategy and Policy Institute, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Mai Thi Tuyet KieuFaculty of Pharmaceutical Management and Economics, Hanoi University of Pharmacy, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Thao Huong NguyenFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Khanh N C DuongSchool of Medicine, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. dnckhanh@medvnu.edu.vn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7152-9476

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication errors significantly compromise patient safety in emergency departments. Although previous studies have investigated the prevalence of these errors in this setting, results have varied widely.

aimThe aim was to report pooled data on the prevalence and severity of medication errors in emergency departments, as well as the proportion of patients affected by these errors.

methodSystematic searches were conducted in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library from database inception until June 2023. Studies provided numerical data on medication errors within emergency departments were eligible for inclusion. Random-effects meta-analysis was employed to pool the prevalence of medication errors, the proportion of patients experiencing these errors, and the error severity levels. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the I

resultsTwenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis gave a pooled prevalence of medication errors in emergency departments of 22.6% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 19.2-25.9%, I

conclusionThe prevalence of medication errors, particularly those potentially harmful, underscores potential safety issues in emergency departments. It is imperative to develop and implement effective interventions aimed at reducing medication errors and enhancing patient safety in this setting.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalMedication ErrorsHumansPatient SafetyPrevalenceEmergency serviceHospitalMedication errorsMeta-analysisPrevalenceSystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.