Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38734846›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2024

3D Characterization of the Aortic Valve and Aortic Arch in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Patients.

Breandan B Yeats, Dahlia Galvez, Sri Krishna Sivakumar, Kimberly Holst, Venkateshwar Polsani, Pradeep K Yadav, Vinod H Thourani, Ajit Yoganathan, Lakshmi P Dasi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Breandan B YeatsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Dahlia GalvezDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sri Krishna SivakumarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kimberly HolstDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Piedmont Heart Institute, Marcus Valve Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Venkateshwar PolsaniDepartment of Cardiology, Piedmont Heart Institute, Marcus Valve Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Pradeep K YadavDepartment of Cardiology, Piedmont Heart Institute, Marcus Valve Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Vinod H ThouraniDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Piedmont Heart Institute, Marcus Valve Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ajit YoganathanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Lakshmi P DasiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. lakshmi.dasi@gatech.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) commonly have associated aortic stenosis and aortopathy. The geometry of the aortic arch and BAV is not well defined quantitatively, which makes clinical classifications subjective or reliant on limited 2D measurements. The goal of this study was to characterize the 3D geometry of the aortic arch and BAV using objective and quantitative techniques. Pre-TAVR computed tomography angiogram (CTA) in patients with BAV and aortic stenosis (AS) were analyzed (n = 59) by assessing valve commissural angle, presence of a fused region, percent of fusion, and calcium volume. The ascending aorta and aortic arch were reconstructed from patient-specific imaging segmentation to generate a centerline and calculate maximum curvature and maximum area change for the ascending aorta and the descending aorta. Aortic valve commissural angle signified a bimodal distribution suggesting tricuspid-like (≤ 150°, 52.5% of patients) and bicuspid-like (> 150°, 47.5%) morphologies. Tricuspid like was further classified by partial (10.2%) or full (42.4%) fusion, and bicuspid like was further classified into valves with fused region (27.1%) or no fused region (20.3%). Qualitatively, the aortic arch was found to have complex patient-specific variations in its 3D shape with some showing extreme diameter changes and kinks. Quantitatively, subgroups were established using maximum curvature threshold of 0.04 and maximum area change of 30% independently for the ascending and descending aorta. These findings provide insight into the geometric structure of the aortic valve and aortic arch in patients presenting with BAV and AS where 3D characterization allows for quantitative classification of these complex anatomic structures.

Indexed as

Aorta, ThoracicAortic ValveBicuspid Aortic Valve DiseaseImaging, Three-DimensionalAgedAged, 80 and overAortic Valve StenosisComputed Tomography AngiographyFemaleHeart Valve DiseasesHumansMaleMiddle AgedAortic stenosisAortopathyBicuspid aortic valve diseaseVessel segmentation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.