Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38734845›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2024

Development and Characterization of Heparin-Containing Hydrogel/3D-Printed Scaffold Composites for Craniofacial Reconstruction.

Nettie E Brown, Lela R Ellerbe, Scott J Hollister, Johnna S Temenoff

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nettie E BrownWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Tech and Emory University, 313 Ferst Dr, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
Lela R EllerbeWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Tech and Emory University, 313 Ferst Dr, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
Scott J HollisterWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Tech and Emory University, 313 Ferst Dr, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA. scott.hollister@bme.gatech.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7625-892X
Johnna S TemenoffWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Tech and Emory University, 313 Ferst Dr, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA. johnna.temenoff@bme.gatech.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9066-7954

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regeneration of cartilage and bone tissues remains challenging in tissue engineering due to their complex structures, and the need for both mechanical support and delivery of biological repair stimuli. Therefore, the goal of this study was to develop a composite scaffold platform for anatomic chondral and osteochondral repair using heparin-based hydrogels to deliver small molecules within 3D-printed porous scaffolds that provide structure, stiffness, and controlled biologic delivery. We designed a mold-injection system to combine hydrolytically degradable hydrogels and 3D-printed scaffolds that could be employed rapidly (< 30 min) in operating room settings (~23 °C). Micro-CT analysis demonstrated the effectiveness of our injection system through homogeneously distributed hydrogel within the pores of the scaffolds. Hydrogels and composite scaffolds exhibited efficient loading (~94%) of a small positively charged heparin-binding molecule (crystal violet) with sustained release over 14 days and showed high viability of encapsulated porcine chondrocytes over 7 days. Compression testing demonstrated nonlinear viscoelastic behavior where tangent stiffness decreased with scaffold porosity (porous scaffold tangent stiffness: 70%: 4.9 MPa, 80%: 1.5 MPa, and 90%: 0.20 MPa) but relaxation was not affected. Lower-porosity scaffolds (70%) showed stiffness similar to lower ranges of trabecular bone (4-8 MPa) while higher-porosity scaffolds (80% and 90%) showed stiffness similar to auricular cartilage (0.16-2 MPa). Ultimately, this rapid composite scaffold fabrication method may be employed in the operating room and utilized to control biologic delivery within load-bearing scaffolds.

Indexed as

HeparinHydrogelsPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsChondrocytesPorositySkullSwineTissue EngineeringHeparinHydrogels3D printingComposite scaffoldsFinite element analysisHydrogelsTissue engineering

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.