ReviewOphthalmology and therapy2024
A Beginner's Guide to Artificial Intelligence for Ophthalmologists.
Review in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- EyeRAG: graph retrieval-augmented generation for safe and accurate clinical dialogue in ophthalmology.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Practical Challenges for the Implementation of AI-Based Image Analysis in Ophthalmology Research: Insights and Recommendations from a Swiss Multicentric Study.Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde · 2026Article
- How does artificial intelligence improve ophthalmology education outcomes?-The mediating role of learning motivation and self-efficacy.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Design and application of a web-based intelligent ophthalmic image analysis teaching platform.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review of Advances in AI-Assisted Analysis of Fundus Fluorescein Angiography (FFA) Images: From Detection to Report Generation.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Review
- Shaping the Future of Healthcare: Ethical Clinical Challenges and Pathways to Trustworthy AI.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Chatbots in Addressing Queries on Vernal Conjunctivitis.Cureus · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Review of AI Diagnosis Strategies for Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD).Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Utilizing Artificial Intelligence for Enhancing Glaucoma Care.Journal of current glaucoma practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in ophthalmology has promoted the development of the discipline, offering opportunities for enhancing diagnostic accuracy, patient care, and treatment outcomes. This paper aims to provide a foundational understanding of AI applications in ophthalmology, with a focus on interpreting studies related to AI-driven diagnostics. The core of our discussion is to explore various AI methods, including deep learning (DL) frameworks for detecting and quantifying ophthalmic features in imaging data, as well as using transfer learning for effective model training in limited datasets. The paper highlights the importance of high-quality, diverse datasets for training AI models and the need for transparent reporting of methodologies to ensure reproducibility and reliability in AI studies. Furthermore, we address the clinical implications of AI diagnostics, emphasizing the balance between minimizing false negatives to avoid missed diagnoses and reducing false positives to prevent unnecessary interventions. The paper also discusses the ethical considerations and potential biases in AI models, underscoring the importance of continuous monitoring and improvement of AI systems in clinical settings. In conclusion, this paper serves as a primer for ophthalmologists seeking to understand the basics of AI in their field, guiding them through the critical aspects of interpreting AI studies and the practical considerations for integrating AI into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.