Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38734634›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2024

Addressing food insecurity in rural primary care: a mixed-methods evaluation of barriers and facilitators.

Kayla E Jordanova, Arvind Suresh, Chelsey R Canavan, Tiffany D'cruze, Alka Dev, Maureen Boardman, Meaghan A Kennedy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. COVID-19 in Rural Ontario Communities: Exploring Women's Mental Health During a Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  6. The relationship between low social/emotional support and health care affordability among rural and urban residents.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kayla E JordanovaDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah, 375 Chipeta Way, Suite A, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA. Kayla.Jordanova@gmail.com.
Arvind SureshDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, M1480, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Chelsey R CanavanPopulation Health Department, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03766, USA.
Tiffany D'cruzeGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 1 Rope Ferry Road, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.
Alka DevThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, 1 Medical Center Dr, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Maureen BoardmanDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Meaghan A KennedyDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.

Funding

Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) & Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) UH1-HP29966
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood insecurity (FI) is associated with negative health outcomes and increased healthcare utilization. Rural populations face increased rates of FI and encounter additional barriers to achieving food security. We sought to identify barriers and facilitators to screening and interventions for FI in rural primary care practices.

methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods study using surveys and semi-structured interviews of providers and staff members from rural primary care practices in northern New England. Survey data were analyzed descriptively, and thematic analysis was used to identify salient interview themes.

resultsParticipants from 24 rural practices completed the survey, and 13 subsequently completed an interview. Most survey respondents (54%) reported their practices systematically screen for FI and 71% reported food needs were "very important" for their patients and communities. Time and resource constraints were the most frequently cited barriers to screening for and addressing FI in practices based on survey results. Interview themes were categorized by screening and intervention procedures, community factors, patient factors, external factors, practice factors, process and implementation factors, and impact of FI screening and interventions. Time and resource constraints were a major theme in interviews, and factors attributed to rural practice settings included geographically large service areas, stigma from loss of privacy in small communities, and availability of food resources through farming.

conclusionsRural primary care practices placed a high value on addressing food needs but faced a variety of barriers to implementing and sustaining FI screening and interventions. Strategies that utilize practice strengths and address time and resource constraints, stigma, and large service areas could promote the adoption of novel interventions to address FI.

Indexed as

Food InsecurityPrimary Health CareAdultFemaleFood SupplyHumansInterviews as TopicMaleNew EnglandRural Health ServicesRural PopulationSurveys and QuestionnairesFood insecurityPrimary careRural healthSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID38734634
PMCPMC11088768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.