ArticleInternational dental journal2024
Microtensile Bond Strength and Failure Mode of Different Universal Adhesives on Human Dentin.
Article in International dental journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison of universal adhesives used in different etching modes on dentin bond strength: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Core Buildup Composite Resins Bond Strength to Dentin and Microhardness Using Universal Adhesives.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Evaluation of microtensile bond strength and failure type analysis of two different types of universal dental adhesives. In vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Effect of Different Specimen Preparation Methods on Dentin Shear Bond Strength: Polyethylene Tubes vs Jig System.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2026Article
- Long-term influence of applied dentin sealing techniques and luting material type on the bond durability of a resin CAD/CAM restorative material.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Microtensile bond strength and dentin-adhesive interface of universal adhesives before and after artificial aging: an in vitro study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Balancing Demineralisation and Collagen Integrity: A Nanoscale Analysis of Etching Time in Human Dentin.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Bond strength and interfacial stability of a universal adhesive to alendronate-treated dentin.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Does Air Abrasion of Dentin Affect the Bonding Performance of Different Universal Adhesives?Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) · 2026Article
- Influence of film thickness of one and two-step universal adhesives on dentin bond strength.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Effect of Etching Mode on the Dentin Bond Durability of Universal Adhesives.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2025Article
- Bonding to Demineralized Dentin: Impact of Immediate and Delayed Dentin Sealing over Time.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Impact of a Novel Pretreatment on Bond Strength of Universal Adhesive to Conventional and CAD/CAM Resin Composites: In Vitro Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Curing modes affects micro-tensile bond strength and durability of dual curing resin cements to dentin.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of this study was to compare the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) and failure mode of 4 different universal adhesive systems (UAs) on human dentin. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study sectioned the occlusal thirds of 32 human third molars and divided them into 4 groups based on the adhesive system used. Group A: Palfique Universal Bond, Group B: Single Bond Universal, Group C: All-Bond Universal, and Group D: One Coat 7 Universal. The specimens underwent a 10,000-cycle thermocycling ageing process prior to testing (n = 32). Afterwards, 8 beams were obtained per group and subjected to µTBS testing using a digital universal testing machine at a speed of 1 mm/min. The microtensile bond strength values were analysed in Megapascals (MPa), and the failure mode was evaluated using a stereomicroscope. Welch's parametric ANOVA with robust variance and the Games-Howell post hoc test were used for µTBS comparisons, and Fisher's exact test was used to determine the association between adhesive type and failure mode. The significance level was set at P < .05.
resultsGroup D showed a significantly higher µTBS than groups A (P < .001) and B (P < .001), but no significant difference was observed with group C (P= .075). Furthermore, groups B and C showed significantly higher µTBS than group A (P< .001 and P < .001, respectively), but there was no significant difference between groups B and C (P = .132). Additionally, group A exhibited a significant association with an adhesive failure mode (P < .05), whereas groups B, C, and D were significantly associated with a mixed failure mode (P < .05).
conclusionThe One Coat 7 Universal adhesive system showed higher microtensile bond strength values and higher chemical interaction with dentin compared to Palfique Universal Bond and Single Bond Universal. However, no significant differences were observed compared to All-Bond Universal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.