ArticleSaudi medical journal2024
Role of artificial intelligence (Google bard) in morphological, histopathological, and radiological image identifications: Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE) type-based performance.
Article in Saudi medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the applicability of AI chatbots in addressing health management issues for living kidney donors.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Review
- Comparative performance of ChatGPT-5 and DeepSeek on the Chinese ultrasound medicine senior professional title examination.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Blind spots in artificial intelligence systems: poor identification of self-generated medical images-evidence-based cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Exploring the role of DeepSeek-R1, ChatGPT-4, and Google Gemini in medical education: How valid and reliable are they?Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Implementation of the first Objective Structured Practical Examination in veterinary medicine in Spain: a two-year experimental study.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Assessing the accuracy and efficiency of Chat GPT-4 Omni (GPT-4o) in biomedical statistics: Comparative study with traditional tools.Saudi medical journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the role of artificial intelligence (Google Bard) in figures, scans, and image identifications and interpretations in medical education and healthcare sciences through an Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE) type of performance.
methodsThe OSPE type of question bank was created with a pool of medical sciences figures, scans, and images. For assessment, 60 figures, scans and images were selected and entered into the given area of the Google Bard to evaluate the knowledge level.
resultsThe marks obtained by Google Bard in brain structures, morphological and radiological images 7/10 (70%); bone structures, radiological images 9/10 (90%); liver structure and morphological, pathological images 4/10 (40%); kidneys structure and morphological images 2/7 (28.57%); neuro-radiological images 4/7 (57.14%); and endocrine glands including the thyroid, pancreas, breast morphological and radiological images 8/16 (50%). The overall total marks obtained by Google Bard in various OSPE figures, scans, and image identification questions were 34/60 (56.7%).
conclusionGoogle Bard scored satisfactorily in morphological, histopathological, and radiological image identifications and their interpretations. Google Bard may assist medical students, faculty in medical education and physicians in healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.