Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38734073›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2024

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Mesothelioma Staging Project: Proposals for the "N" Descriptors in the Forthcoming Ninth Edition of the TNM Classification for Pleural Mesothelioma.

Andrea Bille, R Taylor Ripley, Dorothy J Giroux, Ritu R Gill, Hedy L Kindler, Anna K Nowak, Isabelle Opitz, Harvey I Pass, Andrea Wolf, David Rice and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Pleural mesothelioma.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Andrea BilleThoracic Surgery Department, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: andrea.bille@gstt.nhs.uk.
R Taylor RipleyDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Dorothy J GirouxCancer Research And Biostatistics, Seattle, Washington.
Ritu R GillDepartment of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Hedy L KindlerDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Anna K NowakNational Centre for Asbestos-Related Diseases, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Isabelle OpitzDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Harvey I PassDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.
Andrea WolfDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai, New York, New York.
David RiceDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Valerie W RuschThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Members of the Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee, Advisory Boards, and Participating Institutions

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer developed an international database to inform potential revisions in the ninth edition of the TNM classification of diffuse pleural mesothelioma (PM). This study analyzed the clinical and pathologic N categories to determine whether revisions were indicated relative to the eighth edition staging system.

methodsOf 7338 PM cases diagnosed from 2013 to 2022 and 3598 met all inclusion criteria for planned analyses. Data on 2836 patients without metastases were included in this study. Overall survival (OS) was measured from date of diagnosis. Patients were included regardless of whether they received neoadjuvant treatment. For the pathologic N analysis, patients who underwent resection (extrapleural pneumonectomy or pleurectomy/decortication) were included. N subgroups were analyzed and OS assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method.

resultsThe existing eighth edition N categories were performed adequately in the ninth edition data set. A median OS advantage was noted for clinical and pathologic N0 versus N1 patients: 23.2 versus 18.5 and 33.8 versus 25.0 months, respectively. Patients with resected pN0 had a 3-year OS of 48%. No difference in OS was noted for single- versus multiple-station nodal metastases. The number of nodal stations sampled at the time of resection was not associated with a difference in OS.

conclusionsData regarding clinical and pathologic N categories corroborate those used in the eighth edition. No changes in the N categories are recommended in the ninth edition of PM staging system.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMesotheliomaNeoplasm StagingPleural NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMesothelioma, MalignantMiddle AgedMalignant pleural mesotheliomaNodal metastasesStagingTNM classification

Identifiers

PMID38734073
PMCPMC11380593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.