ArticleThe Lancet. Microbe2024
Identification of bacterial determinants of tuberculosis infection and treatment outcomes: a phenogenomic analysis of clinical strains.
Article in The Lancet. Microbe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction and clinical application of an innovative pharmacist-led service model for therapeutic drug monitoring in tuberculosis treatment: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Trial
- Heterogeneity in microbial antibiotic responses: genetic basis and within-host evolution.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2026Review
- Strain diversity drives heterogeneous responses to tuberculosis combination therapy.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Article
- The host immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis determining protection or disease progression.Nature immunology · 2026Review
- Human genetic ancestry,eLife · 2026Article
- Protection against reinfection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis extends across heterologous Mtb lineages.Mucosal immunology · 2026Article
- Article
- Variability in intrinsic drug tolerance inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis biology, pathogenicity and interaction with the host.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2025Review
- Article
- Clinical and bacterial determinants of unfavorable tuberculosis treatment outcomes: an observational study in Georgia.Genome medicine · 2025Observational
- Strain diversity drives heterogeneous responses to tuberculosis combination therapy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex Lineage 1: A neglected cause of tuberculosis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Review
- Genes required forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Genetic determinants ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Ecology, global diversity and evolutionary mechanisms in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2025Review
- Strategies for shortening tuberculosis therapy.Nature medicine · 2025Review
- Impact of rpoB gene mutations and Rifampicin-resistance levels on treatment outcomes in Rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Understanding Mycobacterium tuberculosis through its genomic diversity and evolution.PLoS pathogens · 2025Review
- Predicting fitness inFrontiers in tuberculosis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBacterial diversity could contribute to the diversity of tuberculosis infection and treatment outcomes observed clinically, but the biological basis of this association is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to identify associations between phenogenomic variation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and tuberculosis clinical features.
methodsWe developed a high-throughput platform to define phenotype-genotype relationships in M tuberculosis clinical isolates, which we tested on a set of 158 drug-sensitive M tuberculosis strains sampled from a large tuberculosis clinical study in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam. We tagged the strains with unique genetic barcodes in multiplicate, allowing us to pool the strains for in-vitro competitive fitness assays across 16 host-relevant antibiotic and metabolic conditions. Relative fitness was quantified by deep sequencing, enumerating output barcode read counts relative to input normalised values. We performed a genome-wide association study to identify phylogenetically linked and monogenic mutations associated with the in-vitro fitness phenotypes. These genetic determinants were further associated with relevant clinical outcomes (cavitary disease and treatment failure) by calculating odds ratios (ORs) with binomial logistic regressions. We also assessed the population-level transmission of strains associated with cavitary disease and treatment failure using terminal branch length analysis of the phylogenetic data.
findingsM tuberculosis clinical strains had diverse growth characteristics in host-like metabolic and drug conditions. These fitness phenotypes were highly heritable, and we identified monogenic and phylogenetically linked variants associated with the fitness phenotypes. These data enabled us to define two genetic features that were associated with clinical outcomes. First, mutations in Rv1339, a phosphodiesterase, which were associated with slow growth in glycerol, were further associated with treatment failure (OR 5·34, 95% CI 1·21-23·58, p=0·027). Second, we identified a phenotypically distinct slow-growing subclade of lineage 1 strains (L1.1.1.1) that was associated with cavitary disease (OR 2·49, 1·11-5·59, p=0·027) and treatment failure (OR 4·76, 1·53-14·78, p=0·0069), and which had shorter terminal branch lengths on the phylogenetic tree, suggesting increased transmission.
interpretationSlow growth under various antibiotic and metabolic conditions served as in-vitro intermediate phenotypes underlying the association between M tuberculosis monogenic and phylogenetically linked mutations and outcomes such as cavitary disease, treatment failure, and transmission potential. These data suggest that M tuberculosis growth regulation is an adaptive advantage for bacterial success in human populations, at least in some circumstances. These data further suggest markers for the underlying bacterial processes that contribute to these clinical outcomes.
fundingNational Health and Medical Research Council/A∗STAR, National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and the Wellcome Trust Fellowship in Public Health and Tropical Medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.