Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38733571›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2024

Imaging and therapy in prostate cancer using prostate specific membrane antigen radioligands.

Mitesh Naik, Sairah R Khan, Valerie Lewington, Amarnath Challapalli, Amy Eccles, Tara D Barwick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Quantitative characterization ofMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The [18F] F-PSMA Probe: Chemical Perspectives.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mitesh NaikImaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7257-7488
Sairah R KhanImaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom.
Valerie LewingtonDivision of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom.
Amarnath ChallapalliDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Bristol Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS2 8ED, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3683-9583
Amy EcclesImaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom.
Tara D BarwickImaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9776-8766

Funding

Imperial Biomedical Research CentreNIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) directed PET imaging has rapidly transformed prostate cancer workup over the past decade and paved the way for a theranostic approach using 177Lu-labelled PSMA radioligand therapy (RLT). This review gives an overview of the underlying principles behind PSMA as a target; the current use of PSMA PET in prostate cancer imaging and benefits compared to conventional imaging; and therapeutic applications including optimisation of patient selection. It also explores the evidence base of PSMA PET for other indications not in routine clinical use and the future of PSMA-directed RLT.

Indexed as

Antigens, SurfaceGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIProstatic NeoplasmsRadiopharmaceuticalsHumansLigandsLutetiumMalePositron-Emission TomographyRadioisotopesAntigens, SurfaceFOLH1 protein, humanGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IILigandsLutetiumLutetium-177RadioisotopesRadiopharmaceuticalslutetium 177prostate cancerprostate specific membrane antigentheranostics

Identifiers

PMID38733571
PMCPMC11256943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.