Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38733493›Full record

ArticleInfectious diseases and therapy2024

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Maternal Immunization with RSVpreF Vaccine for the Prevention of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Among Infants in Spain.

Javier Álvarez Aldean, Irene Rivero Calle, Rosa Rodríguez Fernández, Susana Aceituno Mata, Alba Bellmunt, Miriam Prades, Amy W Law, Alejandra López-Ibáñez de Aldecoa, Cristina Méndez, María L García Somoza and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Javier Álvarez AldeanHospital Costa del Sol, Marbella, Málaga, Spain.
Irene Rivero CalleHospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain.
Rosa Rodríguez FernándezHospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Susana Aceituno MataMarket Access, Outcomes'10 S.L., Castellón de La Plana, Castellón, Spain.
Alba BellmuntMarket Access, Outcomes'10 S.L., Castellón de La Plana, Castellón, Spain. abellmunt@outcomes10.com.
Miriam PradesMarket Access, Outcomes'10 S.L., Castellón de La Plana, Castellón, Spain.
Amy W LawPfizer, Inc., New York, USA.
Alejandra López-Ibáñez de AldecoaPfizer S.L.U, Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina MéndezPfizer S.L.U, Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain.
María L García SomozaPfizer S.L.U, Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain.
Javier SotoFormer Pfizer S.L.U Employee, Madrid, Spain.
Virginia LozanoPfizer S.L.U, Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRespiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading cause of acute lower respiratory infections (ALRI) in children under one year of age. In high-income countries, RSV infections cause a significant overload of care every winter, imposing a significant burden to the healthcare system, which has made the development of prevention strategies a major global health priority. In this context, a new bivalent RSV prefusion F protein-based vaccine (RSVpreF) has recently been approved. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vaccinating pregnant women with the RSVpreF vaccine to prevent RSV in infants from the Spanish National Healthcare System (NHS) perspective.

methodsA hypothetical cohort framework and a Markov-type process were used to estimate clinical outcomes, costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and cost-per-QALY gained (willingness-to-pay threshold: €25,000/QALY) for newborn infants born to RSV-vaccinated versus unvaccinated mothers over an RSV season. The base case analysis was performed from the NHS perspective including direct costs (€2023) and applying a discount of 3% to future costs and outcomes. To evaluate the robustness of the model, several scenarios, and deterministic and probabilistic analyses were carried out. All the parameters and assumptions were validated by a panel of experts.

resultsThe results of the study showed that year-round maternal vaccination program with 70% coverage is a dominant option compared to no intervention, resulting in direct cost savings of €1.8 million each year, with an increase of 551 QALYs. Maternal vaccination could prevent 38% of hospital admissions, 23% of emergency room visits, 19% of primary care visits, and 34% of deaths due to RSV. All scenario analyses showed consistent results, and according to the probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA), the probability of maternal vaccination being cost-effective versus no intervention was 99%.

conclusionsFrom the Spanish NHS perspective, maternal vaccination with bivalent RSVpreF is a dominant alternative compared with a non-prevention strategy.

Indexed as

Cost-effectivenessMaternal immunizationRespiratory syncytial virus (RSV)RSVpreF vaccineSpain

Identifiers

PMID38733493
PMCPMC11128416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.