Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38733489›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of clinical oncology2024

Treatment strategy for HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer: salvage-line strategy for advanced gastric cancer.

Naohiro Nishida, Daisuke Sakai, Taroh Satoh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Naohiro NishidaCenter for Cancer Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Osaka University Hospital, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3216-8513
Daisuke SakaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Taroh SatohCenter for Cancer Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Osaka University Hospital, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. taroh@cfs.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) comes into third-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer, the therapeutic strategy has been dramatically changed. Recent first-line regimen, which consists of ICI and chemotherapeutic agents, prolonged progression-free survival, and subsequent treatment options enabled continuous treatment beyond second-line therapy. Moreover, the advent of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted agents including angiogenesis inhibitors and TKIs provides an opportunity of considering the interaction between ICI and anti-VEGF agents, and facilitating novel treatment proposal. Although clinical benefit of prolonged VEGF blockade after disease progression has not been confirmed in gastric cancer, combination therapy of cytotoxic agents and anti-VEGF agent, such as irinotecan plus ramucirumab demonstrated favorable objective response rate and progression-free survival in third- or later-line setting. In this review, we discuss recent progress and future directions of later-line treatments of HER2-negative advancer gastric cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesSalvage TherapyStomach NeoplasmsAngiogenesis InhibitorsHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsProgression-Free SurvivalRamucirumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiogenesis InhibitorsERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsRamucirumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAdvanced gastric cancerAnti-VEGF treatmentImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)Later-line treatmentTyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)

Identifiers

PMID38733489
PMCPMC11347465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.