Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38733485›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2024

To close, not to close, or to act bigger? Managing the defect of large direct inguinal hernia to reduce the risk of recurrence during laparoscopic TAPP repair: a retrospective cohort study.

F Brucchi, F Ferraina, E Masci, D Ferrara, D Cassini, G Faillace

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Outcomes of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair in the elderly population: a retrospective cohort study.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

F BrucchiUniversity of Milano Statale, via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122, Milan, MI, Italy. brucchi.francesco@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3191-4369
F FerrainaUniversity of Milano Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20126, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3697-0001
E MasciASST Nord Milano- Department of General Surgery, Sesto San Giovanni Hospital, Sesto San Giovanni, MI, Italy.
D FerraraASST Nord Milano Department of General Surgery, Edoardo Bassini Hospital, Cinisello Balsamo, MI, Italy.
D CassiniASST Nord Milano- Department of General Surgery, Sesto San Giovanni Hospital, Sesto San Giovanni, MI, Italy.
G FaillaceASST Nord Milano- Department of General Surgery, Sesto San Giovanni Hospital, Sesto San Giovanni, MI, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hernia recurrence is a common complication after inguinal hernia repair. Recent studies suggest that laparoscopic mesh repair with closure of direct hernia defects can reduce recurrence rates. Our study examines the effectiveness of this approach. A retrospective, multi-center cohort study was conducted on cases performed from January 2013 to April 2021. Patients with direct inguinal hernias (M3 according to EHS classification) undergoing TAPP were included. Three groups were present: closed-defect group, non-closed placing a standard-sized mesh group or non-closed placing an XL-sized mesh group. A 2-year follow-up was recorded. A total of 158 direct M3 inguinal hernias in 110 patients who underwent surgery were present. After propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio, 22 patients for each group were analyzed. The mean age of patients was 62 years (41-84); with the majority being male (84.8%). 22 patients (40 hernias) underwent closure of the defect; 22 patients (39 hernias) did not undergo closure and used a standard-sized mesh; 22 patients (27 hernias) did not undergo closure and used an XL-sized mesh. There were 5 recurrences at 1 year post-operatively: all in the non-closure group with standard-sized mesh. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.044). There were 7 recurrences (6.6%) at 2 years post-operatively: 6 in the non-closure group with standard-sized mesh and 1 in the non-closure group with XL-sized mesh (p = 0.007). Closing large direct inguinal hernia defects has shown promise in reducing early recurrence rates. However, conducting larger RCTs in the future could provide more conclusive evidence that might impact the way we approach laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Indexed as

Hernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyLaparoscopyRecurrenceSurgical MeshAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesDirect inguinal herniaGroin hernia surgeryInguinal herniaLaparoscopyTAPP

Identifiers

PMID38733485
PMCPMC11541364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.