Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38733482›Full record

ReviewBulletin of experimental biology and medicine2024

Estimation of the Ischemic Lesion in the Experimental Stroke Studies Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Review).

D D Namestnikova, E A Cherkashova, I S Gumin, V P Chekhonin, K N Yarygin, I L Gubskiy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D D NamestnikovaFederal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies, Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russia.
E A CherkashovaFederal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies, Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russia.
I S GuminFederal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies, Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russia.
V P ChekhoninPirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
K N YaryginV. N. Orekhovich Research Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
I L GubskiyFederal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies, Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russia. gubskiy.ilya@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In translational animal study aimed at evaluation of the effectiveness of innovative methods for treating cerebral stroke, including regenerative cell technologies, of particular importance is evaluation of the dynamics of changes in the volume of the cerebral infarction in response to therapy. Among the methods for assessing the focus of infarction, MRI is the most effective and convenient tool for use in preclinical studies. This review provides a description of MR pulse sequences used to visualize cerebral ischemia at various stages of its development, and a detailed description of the MR semiotics of cerebral infarction. A comparison of various methods for morphometric analysis of the focus of a cerebral infarction, including systems based on artificial intelligence for a more objective measurement of the volume of the lesion, is also presented.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceBrain IschemiaCerebral InfarctionDisease Models, AnimalIschemic StrokeStrokeartificial intelligenceischemic strokemodel of experimental brain infarctionmorphometryMRI

Identifiers

PMID38733482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.