ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2024
Multiparametric approach with synthetic MR imaging for diagnosing salivary gland lesions.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative prediction of meningioma grade based on synthetic MRI quantitative T1 and T2 mapping.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Imaging of benign salivary gland tumors: an update based on the fifth WHO classification, with a focus on rare histologic types and newly listed entities-part I.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Musculoskeletal Radiology: Bridging Innovation and Clinical Application.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026Review
- Impact of the Magnetization Transfer Effect on T1 Measurements in Quantitative MR Imaging: Comparison of the Two-dimensional Multidynamic Multiecho (2D-MDME) and Three-dimensional Quantification Using an Interleaved Look-Locker Acquisition Sequence (3D-QALAS) Protocols on Two Systems.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025Article
- Synthetic DWI: contrast improvement for diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate using T1 shine-through by synthesizing images with adjusted TR and TE.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Improving Diagnostic Performance for Head and Neck Tumors with Simple Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and Machine Learning Bi-Parameter Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine whether synthetic MR imaging can distinguish between benign and malignant salivary gland lesions.
methodsThe study population included 44 patients with 33 benign and 11 malignant salivary gland lesions. All MR imaging was obtained using a 3 Tesla system. The QRAPMASTER pulse sequence was used to acquire images with four TI values and two TE values, from which quantitative images of T1 and T2 relaxation times and proton density (PD) were generated. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare T1, T2, PD, and ADC values among the subtypes of salivary gland lesions. ROC analysis was used to evaluate diagnostic capability between malignant tumors (MTs) and either pleomorphic adenomas (PAs) or Warthin tumors (WTs). We further calculated diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing malignant from benign lesions when combining these parameters.
resultsPAs demonstrated significantly higher T1, T2, PD, and ADC values than WTs (all p < 0.001). Compared to MTs, PAs had significantly higher T1, T2, and ADC values (all p < 0.001), whereas WTs had significantly lower T1, T2, and PD values (p < 0.001, p = 0.008, and p = 0.003, respectively). T2 and ADC were most effective in differentiating between MTs and PAs (AUC = 0.928 and 0.939, respectively), and T1 and PD values for differentiating between MTs and WTs (AUC = 0.915 and 0.833, respectively). Combining T1 with T2 or ADC achieved accuracy of 86.4% in distinguishing between malignant and benign tumors. Similarly, combining PD with T2 or ADC reached accuracy of 86.4% for differentiating between malignant and benign tumors.
conclusionsUtilizing a combination of synthetic MRI parameters may assist in differentiating malignant from benign salivary gland lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.