Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38733454›Full record

Trial reportChinese journal of integrative medicine2024

Efficacy and Safety of Bufei Jiedu Granules in Treating Multidrug-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Multi-center, Double-Blinded and Randomized Controlled Trial.

Shao-Yan Zhang, Lei Qiu, Shun-Xian Zhang, He-Ping Xiao, Nai-Hui Chu, Xia Zhang, Hui-Qiang Zhang, Pei-Yong Zheng, Hui-Yong Zhang, Zhen-Hui Lu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Chinese journal of integrative medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shao-Yan ZhangInstitute of Respiratory Diseases, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Lei QiuInstitute of Respiratory Diseases, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Shun-Xian ZhangClinical Research Center, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China.
He-Ping XiaoDepartment of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Nai-Hui ChuDepartment of Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 101100, China.
Xia ZhangDepartment of Tuberculosis, the Second Hospital of Nanjing, Nanjing, 210003, China.
Hui-Qiang ZhangDepartment of Tuberculosis, the First Hospital Affiliated to Xinxiang Medical College, Xinxiang, Henan Province, 453100, China.
Pei-Yong ZhengClinical Research Center, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Hui-Yong ZhangInstitute of Respiratory Diseases, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Zhen-Hui LuInstitute of Respiratory Diseases, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China. Dr_luzh@shutcm.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of Bufei Jiedu (BFJD) ranules as adjuvant therapy for patients with multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis (MDR-PTB).

methodsA large-scale, multi-center, double-blinded, and randomized controlled trial was conducted in 18 sentinel hospitals in China from December 2012 to December 2016. A total of 312 MDR-PTB patients were randomly assigned to BFJD Granules or placebo groups (1:1) using a stratified randomization method, which both received the long-course chemotherapy regimen for 18 months (6 Am-Lfx-P-Z-Pto, 12 Lfx-P-Z-Pto). Meanwhile, patients in both groups also received BFJD Granules or placebo twice a day for a total of 18 months, respectively. The primary outcome was cure rate. The secondary outcomes included time to sputum-culture conversion, changes in lung cavities and quality of life (QoL) of patients. Adverse reactions were monitored during and after the trial.

resultsA total of 216 cases completed the trial, 111 in the BFJD Granules group and 105 in the placebo group. BFJD Granules, as an adjuvant treatment, increased the cure rate by 13.6% at the end of treatment, compared with the placebo (58.4% vs. 44.8%, P=0.02), and accelerated the median time to sputum-culture conversion (5 months vs. 11 months). The cavity closure rate of the BFJD Granules group (50.6%, 43/85) was higher than that of the placebo group (32.1%, 26/81; P=0.02) in patients who completed the treatment. At the end of the intensive treatment, according to the 36-item Short Form, the BFJD Granules significantly improved physical functioning, general health, and vitality of patients relative to the placebo group (all P<0.01). Overall, the death rates in the two groups were not significantly different; 5.1% (8/156) in the BFJD Granules group and 2.6% (4/156) in the placebo group.

conclusionsSupplementing BFJD Granules with the long-course chemotherapy regimen significantly increased the cure rate and cavity closure rates, and rapidly improved QoL of patients with MDR-PTB (Registration No. ChiCTR-TRC-12002850).

Indexed as

Drugs, Chinese HerbalTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeTuberculosis, PulmonaryDrugs, Chinese Herbalalternative medicineBufei Jiedu GranulesChinese herbal formulalong-course chemotherapy regimenmultidrug-resistant tuberculosisrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.