Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38733402›Full record

Observational studyCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2024

The efficacy and safety of adding PD-1 blockade to induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (IC-CCRT) for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an observational, propensity score-matched analysis.

Ya-Nan Jin, Meng-Yun Qiang, Ying Wang, Yu-Jing Lin, Ren-Wei Jiang, Wan-Wei Cao, Wang-Jian Zhang, Si-Yang Wang, Hong-Yu Zhang, Ji-Jin Yao

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ya-Nan Jin *The Cancer Center of the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong Province, 519000, China.
Meng-Yun Qiang *Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310022, China.
Ying Wang *Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong Province, 519000, China.
Yu-Jing LinDepartment of Pathology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong Province, 519001, China.
Ren-Wei JiangThe Cancer Center of the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong Province, 519000, China.
Wan-Wei CaoDepartment of Pathology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong Province, 519001, China.
Wang-Jian ZhangDepartment of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, China.
Si-Yang WangThe Cancer Center of the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong Province, 519000, China.
Hong-Yu ZhangThe Cancer Center of the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong Province, 519000, China. zhhyu@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Ji-Jin YaoThe Cancer Center of the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong Province, 519000, China. yaojj23@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2023M744028Excellent Young Researchers Program of the 5th Affiliated Hospital of SYSU WYYXQN-2021015Excellent Young Researchers Program of the 5th Affiliated Hospital of SYSU WYYXQN-2023002Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong, China 2021A1515220128Science and Technology Program of Zhuhai, China 2220004000192Science and Technology Program of Zhuhai, China 2220004000224the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82203194the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82303429the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82373429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the success of PD-1 blockade in recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), its effect for locoregionally advanced NPC (LANPC) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the benefit of adding PD-1 blockade to the current standard treatment (gemcitabine and cisplatin IC <induction chemotherapy> plus cisplatin CCRT <concurrent chemoradiotherapy>) for LANPC patients.

methodsFrom January 2020 to November 2022, 347 patients with non-metastatic high-risk LANPC (stage III-IVA, excluding T3-4N0) were included. Of the 347 patients, 268 patients were treated with standard treatment (IC-CCRT), and 79 received PD-1 blockade plus IC-CCRT (PD-1 group). For the PD-1 group, PD-1 blockade was given intravenously once every 3 weeks for up to 9 cycles (3 induction and 6 adjuvant). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) (i.e. freedom from local/regional/distant failure or death). The propensity score matching (PSM) with the ratio of 1:2 was performed to control confounding factors.

resultsAfter PSM analysis, 150 patients receiving standard treatment and 75 patients receiving additional PD-1 blockade remained in the current analysis. After three cycles of IC, the PD-1 group had significantly higher rates of complete response (defined as disappearance of all target lesions; 24% vs. 9%; P = 0.006) and complete biological response (defined as undetectable cell-free Epstein-Barr virus DNA, cfEBV DNA; 79% vs. 65%; P = 0.046) than that in the standard group. And the incidence of grade 3-4 toxicity during IC was 47% in the PD-1 group and 41% in the standard group, with no significant difference (P = 0.396). During follow-up period, additional PD-1 blockade to standard treatment improved 3-year DFS from 84 to 95%, with marginal statistical significance (HR, 0.28; 95%CI, 0.06-1.19; P = 0.064).

conclusionAdditiaonl PD-1 blockade to gemcitabine and cisplatin IC and adjuvant treatment results in significant improvement in tumor regression, cfEBV DNA clearance, superior DFS, and comparable toxicity profiles in high-risk LANPC patients.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyInduction ChemotherapyNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsPropensity ScoreAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCisplatinDeoxycytidineFemaleGemcitabineHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedCisplatinDeoxycytidineGemcitabineImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorEfficacyInduction chemotherapyNasopharyngeal carcinomaPD-1 blockadeToxicity

Identifiers

PMID38733402
PMCPMC11088572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.