Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38733392›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024

Interpretable multiphasic CT-based radiomic analysis for preoperatively differentiating benign and malignant solid renal tumors: a multicenter study.

Yaohai Wu, Fei Cao, Hanqi Lei, Shiqiang Zhang, Hongbing Mei, Liangchao Ni, Jun Pang

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yaohai WuDepartment of Urology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Fei CaoDepartment of Urology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Hanqi LeiDepartment of Urology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Shiqiang ZhangDepartment of Urology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Hongbing MeiDepartment of Urology, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Liangchao NiDepartment of Urology, Guangdong and Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Jun PangDepartment of Urology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China. pangjun2@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

Research Start-up Fund of the Seven Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University ZSQYJZPI202003Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen SZSM202011011the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82272689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo develop and compare machine learning models based on triphasic contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) for distinguishing between benign and malignant renal tumors. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn total, 427 patients were enrolled from two medical centers: Center 1 (serving as the training set) and Center 2 (serving as the external validation set). First, 1781 radiomic features were individually extracted from corticomedullary phase (CP), nephrographic phase (NP), and excretory phase (EP) CECT images, after which 10 features were selected by the minimum redundancy maximum relevance method. Second, random forest (RF) models were constructed from single-phase features (CP, NP, and EP) as well as from the combination of features from all three phases (TP). Third, the RF models were assessed in the training and external validation sets. Finally, the internal prediction mechanisms of the models were explained by the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach.

resultsA total of 266 patients with renal tumors from Center 1 and 161 patients from Center 2 were included. In the training set, the AUCs of the RF models constructed from the CP, NP, EP, and TP features were 0.886, 0.912, 0.930, and 0.944, respectively. In the external validation set, the models achieved AUCs of 0.860, 0.821, 0.921, and 0.908, respectively. The "original_shape_Flatness" feature played the most important role in the prediction outcome for the RF model based on EP features according to the SHAP method.

conclusionsThe four RF models efficiently differentiated benign from malignant solid renal tumors, with the EP feature-based RF model displaying the best performance.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaKidney NeoplasmsMachine LearningRadiomicsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaComputed tomographyRadiomicsRandom forestRenal tumorsSHapley Additive exPlanations

Identifiers

PMID38733392
PMCPMC11335970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.