ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Hybrid Anomaly Detection in Time Series by Combining Kalman Filters and Machine Learning Models.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Digital Twin-Driven Dual-Stage Adversarial Transfer Learning Method for Lamb Wave-Based Structural Damage Localization Under Limited Sensing Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Hybrid PCA-Based and Machine Learning Approaches for Signal-Based Interference Detection and Anomaly Classification Under Synthetic Data Conditions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- CRTSC: Channel-Wise Recalibration and Texture-Structural Consistency Constraint for Anomaly Detection in Medical Chest Images.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Edge-Based Real-Time Fault Detection in UAV Systems via B-Spline Telemetry Reconstruction and Lightweight Hybrid AI.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to connectivity and automation trends, the medical device industry is experiencing increased demand for safety and security mechanisms. Anomaly detection has proven to be a valuable approach for ensuring safety and security in other industries, such as automotive or IT. Medical devices must operate across a wide range of values due to variations in patient anthropometric data, making anomaly detection based on a simple threshold for signal deviations impractical. For example, surgical robots directly contacting the patient's tissue require precise sensor data. However, since the deformation of the patient's body during interaction or movement is highly dependent on body mass, it is impossible to define a single threshold for implausible sensor data that applies to all patients. This also involves statistical methods, such as Z-score, that consider standard deviation. Even pure machine learning algorithms cannot be expected to provide the required accuracy simply due to the lack of available training data. This paper proposes using hybrid filters by combining dynamic system models based on expert knowledge and data-based models for anomaly detection in an operating room scenario. This approach can improve detection performance and explainability while reducing the computing resources needed on embedded devices, enabling a distributed approach to anomaly detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.