ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
An Improved Data Processing Algorithm for Spectrally Resolved Interferometry Using a Femtosecond Laser.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Review: Grating Encoder Technologies for Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Spatial Measurement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spectrally resolved interferometry utilizing a femtosecond laser is widely employed for absolute distance measurement. However, deviations in the output time pulse of the conventional algorithm through inverse Fourier transform are inevitable. Herein, an improved data processing algorithm employing a time-shifting parameter is proposed to improve the accuracy of spectrally resolved interferometry. The principle of the proposed time-shifting algorithm is analyzed theoretically after clarifying the deviation source of the conventional algorithm. Simulation and experimental work were conducted to indicate the improvement in the accuracy of the output absolute distance. The results demonstrated that the proposed algorithm could reduce the deviation of output distances towards the reference values, reaching 0.58 μm by half compared to the conventional algorithm. Furthermore, the measurement uncertainty was evaluated using the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM), resulting in an expanded uncertainty of 0.71 μm with a 95% confidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.