Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38732954›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Toward Synthetic Physical Fingerprint Targets.

Laurenz Ruzicka, Bernhard Strobl, Stephan Bergmann, Gerd Nolden, Tom Michalsky, Christoph Domscheit, Jannis Priesnitz, Florian Blümel, Bernhard Kohn, Clemens Heitzinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Laurenz RuzickaAustrian Institute of Technology, 1210 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0823-9601
Bernhard StroblAustrian Institute of Technology, 1210 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8920-0468
Stephan BergmannBundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik, 53175 Bonn, Germany.
Gerd NoldenBundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik, 53175 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-1619-2637
Tom MichalskyIDloop GmbH, 07745 Jena, Germany.
Christoph DomscheitIDloop GmbH, 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-7831-3082
Jannis PriesnitzHochschule Darmstadt, 64295 Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0985-7735
Florian BlümelBiometrie-Evaluations-Zentrum (BEZ) Hochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-8753-4346
Bernhard KohnAustrian Institute of Technology, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Clemens HeitzingerInstitute of Information Systems Engineering/Research Unit of Machine Learning, Technische Universität Wien, 1040 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1613-5164

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biometric fingerprint identification hinges on the reliability of its sensors; however, calibrating and standardizing these sensors poses significant challenges, particularly in regards to repeatability and data diversity. To tackle these issues, we propose methodologies for fabricating synthetic 3D fingerprint targets, or phantoms, that closely emulate real human fingerprints. These phantoms enable the precise evaluation and validation of fingerprint sensors under controlled and repeatable conditions. Our research employs laser engraving, 3D printing, and CNC machining techniques, utilizing different materials. We assess the phantoms' fidelity to synthetic fingerprint patterns, intra-class variability, and interoperability across different manufacturing methods. The findings demonstrate that a combination of laser engraving or CNC machining with silicone casting produces finger-like phantoms with high accuracy and consistency for rolled fingerprint recordings. For slap recordings, direct laser engraving of flat silicone targets excels, and in the contactless fingerprint sensor setting, 3D printing and silicone filling provide the most favorable attributes. Our work enables a comprehensive, method-independent comparison of various fabrication methodologies, offering a unique perspective on the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. This facilitates a broader understanding of fingerprint recognition system validation and performance assessment.

Indexed as

biometricfingerprintphantomsensorstandardizationsyntheticvalidation

Identifiers

PMID38732954
PMCPMC11086259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.