ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
USV Trajectory Tracking Control Based on Receding Horizon Reinforcement Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- FFRLS-MPC: An adaptive model predictive control method for robust ship course keeping.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Generalization Enhancement of Visual Reinforcement Learning through Internal States.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a novel approach for achieving high-precision trajectory tracking control in an unmanned surface vehicle (USV) through utilization of receding horizon reinforcement learning (RHRL). The control architecture for the USV involves a composite of feedforward and feedback components. The feedforward control component is derived directly from the curvature of the reference path and the dynamic model. Feedback control is acquired through application of the RHRL algorithm, effectively addressing the problem of achieving optimal tracking control. The methodology introduced in this paper synergizes with the rolling time domain optimization mechanism, converting the perpetual time domain optimal control predicament into a succession of finite time domain control problems amenable to resolution. In contrast to Lyapunov model predictive control (LMPC) and sliding mode control (SMC), our proposed method employs the RHRL controller, which yields an explicit state feedback control law. This characteristic endows the controller with the dual capabilities of direct offline and online learning deployment. Within each prediction time domain, we employ a time-independent executive-evaluator network structure to glean insights into the optimal value function and control strategy. Furthermore, we substantiate the convergence of the RHRL algorithm in each prediction time domain through rigorous theoretical proof, with concurrent analysis to verify the stability of the closed-loop system. To conclude, USV trajectory control tests are carried out within a simulated environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.