Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38732772›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

MYFix: Automated Fixation Annotation of Eye-Tracking Videos.

Negar Alinaghi, Samuel Hollendonner, Ioannis Giannopoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Negar AlinaghiResearch Division Geoinformation, Vienna University of Technology, Wiedner Hauptstraße 8/E120, 1040 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6594-4481
Samuel HollendonnerResearch Division Geoinformation, Vienna University of Technology, Wiedner Hauptstraße 8/E120, 1040 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0009-0000-7923-3357
Ioannis GiannopoulosResearch Division Geoinformation, Vienna University of Technology, Wiedner Hauptstraße 8/E120, 1040 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2556-5230

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mobile eye-tracking research, the automatic annotation of fixation points is an important yet difficult task, especially in varied and dynamic environments such as outdoor urban landscapes. This complexity is increased by the constant movement and dynamic nature of both the observer and their environment in urban spaces. This paper presents a novel approach that integrates the capabilities of two foundation models, YOLOv8 and Mask2Former, as a pipeline to automatically annotate fixation points without requiring additional training or fine-tuning. Our pipeline leverages YOLO's extensive training on the MS COCO dataset for object detection and Mask2Former's training on the Cityscapes dataset for semantic segmentation. This integration not only streamlines the annotation process but also improves accuracy and consistency, ensuring reliable annotations, even in complex scenes with multiple objects side by side or at different depths. Validation through two experiments showcases its efficiency, achieving 89.05% accuracy in a controlled data collection and 81.50% accuracy in a real-world outdoor wayfinding scenario. With an average runtime per frame of 1.61 ± 0.35 s, our approach stands as a robust solution for automatic fixation annotation.

Indexed as

Eye-Tracking TechnologyFixation, OcularAlgorithmsEye MovementsHumansVideo Recordingautomatic fixation annotationobject detectionoutdoor mobile eye-trackingsemantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID38732772
PMCPMC11085856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.