Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38732344›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Individualizing Surveillance after Endovascular Aortic Repair Using a Modular Imaging Algorithm.

Amun Georg Hofmann, Irene Mlekusch, Georg Wickenhauser, Corinna Walter, Fadi Taher, Afshin Assadian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amun Georg HofmannDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinik Ottakring, Montleartstraße 37, 1160 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8264-7796
Irene MlekuschDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinik Ottakring, Montleartstraße 37, 1160 Vienna, Austria.
Georg WickenhauserDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinik Ottakring, Montleartstraße 37, 1160 Vienna, Austria.
Corinna WalterDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinik Ottakring, Montleartstraße 37, 1160 Vienna, Austria.
Fadi TaherDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinik Ottakring, Montleartstraße 37, 1160 Vienna, Austria.
Afshin AssadianDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinik Ottakring, Montleartstraße 37, 1160 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSurveillance after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and fenestrated EVAR (FEVAR) is mainly directed by one-size-fits-all approaches instead of personalized decision making, even though treatment strategies and often endografts themselves are tailor-made to adjust for individual patients. We propose a modular imaging algorithm that escalates surveillance imaging based on invasiveness and need. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this retrospective observational study of single-center data, results of a modular imaging algorithm were analyzed. The algorithm is characterized by initiating the examination with standard B-mode then transitioning to Duplex ultrasound, B-Flow, and CEUS. Additional CT(A) studies are conducted where required. The study population included both patients receiving EVAR or FEVAR. A comparative analysis was conducted regarding endoleak detection.

resultsThe study population included 28 patients receiving EVAR and 40 patients receiving FEVAR. They accounted for 101 follow-up visits, which led to 431 distinct imaging studies. CEUS has the highest endoleak detection rate, followed by CTA and B-Flow. Duplex ultrasound and B-Flow resulted in 0 and 1 false positive cases, respectively, considering CEUS the reference standard. In a select group of six patients, CEUS was omitted after endoleaks were displayed by Duplex ultrasound or B-Flow, leading to a successful type II coiling and no aneurysm-related adverse events.

conclusionsThe proposed modular algorithm showed great potential to incorporate principles of personalized medicine in surveillance after endovascular aortic treatment. Since Duplex ultrasound and B-Flow rarely cause false positive endoleaks, more resource-intensive and invasive imaging studies such as CEUS and CTA can be omitted after positive identification.

Indexed as

endovascular aortic repairEVARFEVARimagingultrasound

Identifiers

PMID38732344
PMCPMC11082944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.