Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38732281›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

New Radiological Corticalization Index as an Indicator of Implant Success Rate Depending on Prosthetic Restoration-5 Years of Follow-Up.

Tomasz Wach, Jakub Okulski, Rafał Zieliński, Grzegorz Trybek, Adam Michcik, Marcin Kozakiewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tomasz WachDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, 113 Żeromskiego Str., 90-549 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4763-8354
Jakub OkulskiDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, 113 Żeromskiego Str., 90-549 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6879-4973
Rafał ZielińskiDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, 113 Żeromskiego Str., 90-549 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9897-5003
Grzegorz TrybekDepartment of Oral Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3900-4901
Adam MichcikDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Mariana Smoluchowskiego 17, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4727-0799
Marcin KozakiewiczDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, 113 Żeromskiego Str., 90-549 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9200-2828

Funding

Medical University of Lodz 503/5-061-02/503-51-001-17Medical University of Lodz 503/5-061-02/503-51-001-18Medical University of Lodz 503/5-061-02/503-51-002-18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The new Radiological Corticalization Index (CI) is an indicator that describes bone remodeling near the dental implant's neck at the pixel level and is not visible to the naked eye. The aim of this research was to evaluate the correlation between the CI and bone remodeling using only radiographic (RTG) images. RTG samples were divided into groups depending on prosthetic restoration; the implant neck area around dental implants was examined, and texture features of the RTG images were analyzed. The study also investigated the type of prosthetic restoration and its influence as a factor on bone structure. The statistical analysis included evaluating feature distribution, comparing means (

Indexed as

bone remodelingcorticalizationdental implantfunctional loadingintra-oral radiographslong-term resultslong-term successmarginal bone lossprosthetic restorationradiomicstexture analysis

Identifiers

PMID38732281
PMCPMC11083295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.