ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Using Biotinylated Iron-Responsive Element to Analyze the Activity of Iron Regulatory Proteins.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parkinson's disease LRRK2 mutations dysregulate iron homeostasis and promote oxidative stress and ferroptosis in human neurons and astrocytes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Iron regulatory proteins (IRP1 and IRP2) are the master regulators of mammalian iron homeostasis. They bind to the iron-responsive elements (IREs) of the transcripts of iron-related genes to regulate their expression, thereby maintaining cellular iron availability. The primary method to measure the IRE-binding activity of IRPs is the electrophoresis mobility shift assay (EMSA). This method is particularly useful for evaluating IRP1 activity, since IRP1 is a bifunctional enzyme and its protein levels remain similar during conversion between the IRE-binding protein and cytosolic aconitase forms. Here, we exploited a method of using a biotinylated-IRE probe to separate IRE-binding IRPs followed by immunoblotting to analyze the IRE-binding activity. This method allows for the successful measurement of IRP activity in cultured cells and mouse tissues under various iron conditions. By separating IRE-binding IRPs from the rest of the lysates, this method increases the specificity of IRP antibodies and verifies whether a band represents an IRP, thereby revealing some previously unrecognized information about IRPs. With this method, we showed that the S711-phosphorylated IRP1 was found only in the IRE-binding form in PMA-treated Hep3B cells. Second, we found a truncated IRE-binding IRP2 isoform that is generated by proteolytic cleavage on sites in the 73aa insert region of the IRP2 protein. Third, we found that higher levels of SDS, compared to 1-2% SDS in regular loading buffer, could dramatically increase the band intensity of IRPs in immunoblots, especially in HL-60 cells. Fourth, we found that the addition of SDS or LDS to cell lysates activated protein degradation at 37 °C or room temperature, especially in HL-60 cell lysates. As this method is more practical, sensitive, and cost-effective, we believe that its application will enhance future research on iron regulation and metabolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.