Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38731389›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Application of Epidemiological Methods in a Large-Scale Cross-Sectional Study in 765 German Dairy Herds-Lessons Learned.

Roswitha Merle, Martina Hoedemaker, Gabriela Knubben-Schweizer, Moritz Metzner, Kerstin-Elisabeth Müller, Amely Campe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Risk Factors for Tail Alterations on German Dairy Farms.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Prevalence of Tail Alterations on German Dairy Farms.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Risk factors for omphalitis in neonatal dairy calves.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Roswitha MerleInstitute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Königsweg 67, 14163 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8688-2926
Martina HoedemakerClinic for Cattle, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15, 30559 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8154-2642
Gabriela Knubben-SchweizerClinic for Ruminants, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Sonnenstr. 16, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0928-5933
Moritz MetznerClinic for Ruminants, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Sonnenstr. 16, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0752-6059
Kerstin-Elisabeth MüllerRuminant and Swine Clinic, School of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Königsweg 65, 14163 Berlin, Germany.
Amely CampeDepartment of Biometry, Epidemiology and Information Processing (IBEI), WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training for Health at the Human-Animal-Environment Interface, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Buenteweg 2, 30559 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9390-759X

Funding

Federal Ministry of Nutrition and Agriculture (Germany) 2814HS006, 2814HS007, 2814HS008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From 2016 to 2020, the "PraeRi" study, conducted by three German veterinary universities, was aimed at enhancing animal health and welfare in dairy farms. With 765 dairy farms visited and 101,307 animals examined, this study provided a basis for improving animal health and welfare. The study population comprised three different regions representing a broad variety of characteristics. To ensure representative estimates, a sample size of 250 farms was determined for each region, employing a stratified sampling plan based on farm size. According to the information provided by the farmers, the most commonly occurring disease in their herds was mastitis without general disorder (14.2% to 16.3% of the herd-depending on the region). For most disorders, prevalence data were lowest for the region South compared with the two remaining regions. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for various target variables, and the results were communicated through individual reports and benchmarking flyers to participating farmers. The authors encountered challenges in management and communication due to the project's size in terms of personnel, data, and farms examined. Harmonizing data management and hypothesis testing across all involved parties added complexity.

Indexed as

cross-sectional studydairy cowsdairy farmsgood epidemiologic practiceincidences of chronic diseases

Identifiers

PMID38731389
PMCPMC11083683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.