Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38731322›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Effects of Two Different Methods of Teeth Grinding on Dental Injuries, Skin Lesions, Growth and Behaviour of Suckling Piglets Compared to a Non-Treated Control Group.

Carolin Bernarda Timphaus, Franziska Anna Kleine Kruthaup, Fritjof Freise, Swetlana Herbrandt, Elisabeth Große Beilage, Michaela Fels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carolin Bernarda TimphausField Station for Epidemiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover Foundation, Büscheler Straße 9, D-49456 Bakum, Germany.
Franziska Anna Kleine KruthaupField Station for Epidemiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover Foundation, Büscheler Straße 9, D-49456 Bakum, Germany.
Fritjof FreiseInstitute for Biometry, Epidemiology and Information Processing, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover Foundation, Bünteweg 2, D-30559 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8493-8359
Swetlana HerbrandtStatistical Consulting and Analysis, Center for Higher Education, TU Dortmund University, Vogelpothsweg 78, D-44227 Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4350-0748
Elisabeth Große BeilageField Station for Epidemiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover Foundation, Büscheler Straße 9, D-49456 Bakum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4391-0333
Michaela FelsInstitute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behaviour, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15, D-30173 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9497-5121

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teeth grinding in suckling piglets is performed on many farms to protect the piglets' littermates and the sow's udder from injuries caused by the piglets' canines and third incisors. In this study, the effects of two teeth-grinding methods on the piglets' dental health and welfare were investigated. The piglets of a litter were evenly assigned to a treatment: one-third of littermates were ground with a roller grinding head (RG), one-third with a teacup grinding head (TCG), and one-third were not ground at all (CG). A random sample of 100 animals each from the RG and TCG treatment was examined for tooth injuries, i.e., dental pulp openings. Additionally, behavioural analysis was performed (

Indexed as

animal welfarebehaviourpigroller grinding headteacup grinding headteeth grinding

Identifiers

PMID38731322
PMCPMC11082941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.