Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38731278›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Comparative Cranial Geometric Morphometrics among Wistar Albino, Sprague Dawley, and WAG/Rij Rat Strains.

Duygu Küçük Ağaç, Burcu Onuk, Ozan Gündemir, Murat Kabak, Nicoleta Manuta, Buket Çakar, Maciej Janeczek, Denise Amber Crampton, Tomasz Szara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Morpho-Geometric Description of the Skulls and Mandibles of Brown Bears (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Duygu Küçük AğaçDepartment of Veterinary, Şiran Mustafa Beyaz Vocational School, Gümüşhane University, 29700 Gümüşhane, Türkiye.
Burcu OnukDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, 55270 Samsun, Türkiye.
Ozan GündemirDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, 34500 Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-3637-8166
Murat KabakDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, 55270 Samsun, Türkiye.
Nicoleta ManutaInstitute of Graduate Studies, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, 34500 Istanbul, Türkiye.
Buket ÇakarInstitute of Graduate Studies, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, 34500 Istanbul, Türkiye.
Maciej JaneczekDepartment of Biostructure and Animal Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4357-2271
Denise Amber CramptonResearch Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK.
Tomasz SzaraDepartment of Morphological Sciences, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8555-6435

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research utilizes geometric morphometrics to investigate shape variation in the skull, mandible, and teeth among three rat strains: Wistar Albino (WA), Sprague Dawley (SD), and WAG/Rij (WR). Through the analysis of 48 rats using 2D geometric morphometric techniques, significant differences in their skull morphology were identified. This study indicates a shift from a rectangular to an oval cranial shape across strains, with notable size and morphological variances. Particularly, the WR strain's skull shape significantly differs from the SD and WA strains, suggesting distinct ecological or genetic pathways. Compared to the skull, mandible shape differences are less pronounced, but still significant. The WR strain exhibits a distinct mandible shape, potentially reflecting ecological adaptations like dietary habits. The teeth shape of WR rats is the most distinct. SD rats consistently exhibited larger sizes in both skull and mandible measurements, while WR rats were notably smaller. Interestingly, sexual dimorphism was not statistically significant in skull and teeth sizes, aligning with findings from previous studies. However, the mandible showed clear size differences between sexes, underscoring its potential for adaptive or behavioral studies. In summary, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of morphological variations in rat strains, highlighting the intricate interplay of size, shape, and ecological factors. These findings lay a foundation for deeper explorations into the adaptive, ecological, or genetic narratives influencing rat morphology.

Indexed as

molar teethshape variationskulltaxonomyveterinary anatomy

Identifiers

PMID38731278
PMCPMC11083316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.