Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38731269›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Tactile, Auditory, and Visual Stimulation as Sensory Enrichment for Dairy Cattle.

Daniel Mota-Rojas, Alexandra L Whittaker, Adriana Domínguez-Oliva, Ana C Strappini, Adolfo Álvarez-Macías, Patricia Mora-Medina, Marcelo Ghezzi, Pamela Lendez, Karina Lezama-García, Temple Grandin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The Welfare of Cattle in Different Housing Systems.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Assessing and Improving Animal Welfare Using Applied Ethology.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Human animal relationships inFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniel Mota-RojasNeurophysiology, Behavior and Animal Welfare Assessment, DPAA, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), Mexico City 04960, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0562-0367
Alexandra L WhittakerSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus, Adelaide, SA 5116, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9011-8296
Adriana Domínguez-OlivaNeurophysiology, Behavior and Animal Welfare Assessment, DPAA, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), Mexico City 04960, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-1584-0654
Ana C StrappiniAnimal Health and Welfare Department, Wageningen Livestock Research, Wageningen University and Research, 6708 WD Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0004-9083-8997
Adolfo Álvarez-MacíasNeurophysiology, Behavior and Animal Welfare Assessment, DPAA, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), Mexico City 04960, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-8650-0641
Patricia Mora-MedinaFacultad de Estudios Superiores Cuautitlán, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Cuautitlán 54714, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-8153-8210
Marcelo GhezziAnatomy Area, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences (FCV), Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (UNCPBA), University Campus, Tandil 7000, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-2519-9522
Pamela LendezAnatomy Area, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences (FCV), Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (UNCPBA), University Campus, Tandil 7000, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-9332-6442
Karina Lezama-GarcíaNeurophysiology, Behavior and Animal Welfare Assessment, DPAA, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), Mexico City 04960, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0084-8135
Temple GrandinDepartment of Animal Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7231-7101

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several types of enrichment can be used to improve animal welfare. This review summarizes the literature on the use of mechanical brushes, tactile udder stimulation, music, and visual stimuli as enrichment methods for dairy cows. Mechanical brushes and tactile stimulation of the udder have been shown to have a positive effect on milk yield and overall behavioral repertoire, enhancing natural behavior. Classical music reduces stress levels and has similarly been associated with increased milk yield. A slow or moderate tempo (70 to 100 bpm) at frequencies below 70 dB is recommended to have this positive effect. Evidence on the impacts of other types of enrichment, such as visual stimulation through mirrors, pictures, and color lights, or the use of olfactory stimuli, is equivocal and requires further study.

Indexed as

cattle behaviorhuman–animal interactionmechanical brushesmusic

Identifiers

PMID38731269
PMCPMC11083412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.