ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
The Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent: A One-Fits-All Strategy for the Treatment of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection?
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Surgical strategies in elderly patients with acute type A aortic dissection-a systematic review.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Pooled it
- New type A arch dissection stent: restoration of supra-aortic vessel perfusion.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Frozen Elephant Trunk versus Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Choosing the Appropriate Arch Strategy.Aorta (Stamford, Conn.) · 2026Article
- First Reported Use of the AMDS Hybrid Prosthesis for Secondary Type A Aortic Dissection After Prior TEVAR.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Repair with the Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Total Arch Replacement with Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent Versus Frozen Elephant Trunk in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Endovascular salvage of renal and common iliac artery malperfusion following inadvertent hybrid arch dissection stent deployment in the false lumen during repair of type A dissection.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2025Article
- The impact of onset-to-cut time in surgery for stable acute type A aortic dissection-a single-centre retrospective cohort study.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024Article
- The frozen elephant trunk technique in acute aortic dissection: the ultimate solution? An institutional experience.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The treatment of DeBakey type I aortic dissection remains a major challenge in the field of aortic surgery. To upgrade the standard of care hemiarch replacement, a novel device called an "Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent" (AMDS) is now available. This hybrid device composed of a proximal polytetrafluoroethylene cuff and a distal non-covered nitinol stent is inserted into the aortic arch and the descending thoracic aorta during hypothermic circulatory arrest in addition to hemiarch replacement. Due to its specific design, it may result in a reduced risk for distal anastomotic new entries, the effective restoration of branch vessel malperfusion and positive aortic remodeling. In this narrative review, we provide an overview about the indications and the technical use of the AMDS. Additionally, we summarize the current available literature and discuss potential pitfalls in the application of the AMDS regarding device failure and aortic re-intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.