Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38731026›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Lithiasis Using Suctioning Devices: A Shift in Paradigm?

Petrisor Geavlete, Razvan Multescu, Cristian Mares, Bogdan Buzescu, Valentin Iordache, Bogdan Geavlete

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Petrisor GeavleteDepartment of Urology, "Saint John" Emergency Clinical Hospital, 042122 Bucharest, Romania.
Razvan MultescuDepartment of Urology, "Saint John" Emergency Clinical Hospital, 042122 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-6586-5046
Cristian MaresDepartment of Urology, "Saint John" Emergency Clinical Hospital, 042122 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-1005-7388
Bogdan BuzescuDepartment of Urology, "Saint John" Emergency Clinical Hospital, 042122 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0009-0001-7581-9681
Valentin IordacheDepartment of Urology, "Saint John" Emergency Clinical Hospital, 042122 Bucharest, Romania.
Bogdan GeavleteDepartment of Urology, "Saint John" Emergency Clinical Hospital, 042122 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-6156-1851

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New suction endoscopes, ureteral access sheaths (UAS) and catheters aim to improve the efficacy of flexible ureteroscopy and optimize its safety. Suction UAS with non-flexible tips have shown promising results, especially in maintaining low intrarenal pressure, but also in removing small debris and reducing the "snow globe" effect. In addition, suctioning UAS with a flexible tip offers the advantage of being able to be navigated through the pyelocaliceal system to where the laser lithotripsy is performed. It can also remove small stone fragments when the flexible ureteroscope is retracted, using the Venturi effect. Direct in-scope suction (DISS) involves aspirating dust and small stone debris through the working channel of a flexible ureteroscope, thus regulating intrarenal pressure and improving visibility. Steerable aspiration catheters are other devices designed to increase stone clearance of the pyelocaliceal system. They are inserted under fluoroscopic guidance into every calyx after retraction of the flexible ureteroscope, alternating irrigation and aspiration to remove dust and small gravels. Combining flexible-tip suction UAS and the DISS technique may offer some advantages worth evaluating. The advantage of using these instruments to achieve a low intrarenal pressure was demonstrated. The true practical impact on the long-term stone-free status is a matter requiring further studies.

Indexed as

aspirationdirect in-scope suctionflexible ureteroscopynegative pressuresteerable cathetersvacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath

Identifiers

PMID38731026
PMCPMC11084153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.