Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38730874›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

The Impurity Removal and Comprehensive Utilization of Phosphogypsum: A Review.

Qingjun Guan, Zhuang Wang, Fujia Zhou, Weijian Yu, Zhigang Yin, Zhenyue Zhang, Ru'an Chi, Juncheng Zhou

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qingjun GuanSchool of Resource Environment and Safety Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5719-5748
Zhuang WangSchool of Resource Environment and Safety Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, China.
Fujia ZhouSchool of Resource Environment and Safety Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, China.
Weijian YuSchool of Resource Environment and Safety Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1497-1759
Zhigang YinLithium Resources and Lithium Materials Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Tianqi Lithium Corporation, Chengdu 610213, China.
Zhenyue ZhangSchool of Xingfa Mining Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430073, China.
Ru'an ChiHubei Three Gorges Laboratory, Yichang 443007, China.
Juncheng ZhouSchool of Mechatronics Engineering, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China U23A20602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phosphogypsum (PG), a byproduct during the phosphoric acid production process, also known as the wet process, contains complex and diverse impurities, resulting in low utilization and considerable accumulation. This leads to a massive waste of land resources and a series of environmental pollution problems. Given the current urgent ecological and environmental situation, developing impurity removal processes with low energy consumption and high efficiency, exploring valuable resource recovery, preparing high value-added PG products, and broadening the comprehensive utilization ways of PG are significant strategies to promote the sustainable consumption of PG and sustainable development of the phosphorus chemical industry. This review comprehensively summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of existing PG impurity removal and utilization technologies and probes into the future development direction, which provides references and ideas for subsequent PG research.

Indexed as

impurity removalphosphogypsumrare earth elementsutilization

Identifiers

PMID38730874
PMCPMC11084927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.