Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38730851›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

The Influence of Thickness on Light Transmission for Pre- and Fully Crystallized Chairside CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Ceramics.

Franciele Floriani, Salahaldeen Abuhammoud, Silvia Rojas-Rueda, Amit Unnadkat, Nicholas G Fischer, Chin-Chuan Fu, Carlos A Jurado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Wavelength-Dependent Transmitted Irradiance Through Lithium Disilicate Ceramics.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Special Issue "Characteristics of Dental Ceramics".Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Franciele FlorianiDepartment of Prosthodontics, The University of Iowa College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52241, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7237-4886
Salahaldeen AbuhammoudDepartment of Prosthodontics, The University of Iowa College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52241, USA.
Silvia Rojas-RuedaDivision of Dental Biomaterials, The University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Dentistry, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
Amit UnnadkatDivision of Operative Dentistry, Department of General Dentistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Dentistry, Memphis, TN 38103, USA.
Nicholas G FischerMinnesota Dental Research for Biomaterials and Biomechanics, University of Minnesota School of Dentistry, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2230-5158
Chin-Chuan FuDepartment of Restorative Sciences, The University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Dentistry, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
Carlos A JuradoDivision of Operative Dentistry, Department of General Dentistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Dentistry, Memphis, TN 38103, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis in vitro study aimed to compare the light-transmission properties of two chairside CAD/CAM lithium disilicate (LD) ceramics (a novel fully crystallized and a traditional pre-crystallized) across varying thicknesses. MATERIALS AND

methodsOne hundred flat specimens were obtained from precrystallized (e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) and fully crystallized (LiSi GC Block; GC, Tokyo, Japan) LD at five different thicknesses (0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.50 and 2.0 mm). All specimens were polished with a polishing system for lithium disilicate restorations following recommendations from the manufacturer. Light transmission was evaluated with a radiometer. The statistical analysis between e.max CAD and LiSi GC Block was performed using a Mann-Whitney test for each thickness at a significance level of 0.05 (

resultsLight transmittance was significantly affected by ceramic thickness. The 0.5 mm thick specimens exhibited the highest transmittance values compared to all other groups, while a light transmittance of 0.00 was observed in the 2.0 mm thick specimens for both e.max CAD and LiSi GC Block. In the comparison between e.max CAD and LiSi GC Block according to thickness, there was a statistically significant difference exclusively between groups with a thickness of 1.50 mm (

conclusionsLight transmission for pre- and fully crystallized CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramics only showed a statistical difference at the thickness of 1.50 mm ( CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: A thickness of 2 mm for chairside CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramics, whether pre-crystallized or fully crystallized, necessitates the use of dual-cure resin luting cement due to reduced light transmission.

Indexed as

CAD-DAMceramicsesthetic dentistrylithium disilicate

Identifiers

PMID38730851
PMCPMC11084812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.