Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38730727›Full record

ReviewCancers2024

Artificial Intelligence in Urologic Robotic Oncologic Surgery: A Narrative Review.

Themistoklis Bellos, Ioannis Manolitsis, Stamatios Katsimperis, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Georgios Feretzakis, Iraklis Mitsogiannis, Ioannis Varkarakis, Bhaskar K Somani, Lazaros Tzelves

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Artificial intelligence: revolutionizing robotic surgery: review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Themistoklis Bellos2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio General Hospital of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0390-1467
Ioannis Manolitsis2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio General Hospital of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-1496-0742
Stamatios Katsimperis2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio General Hospital of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7028-1544
Patrick Juliebø-JonesDepartment of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5009 Bergen, Norway.
Georgios FeretzakisSchool of Science and Technology, Hellenic Open University, 26335 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3597-1187
Iraklis Mitsogiannis2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio General Hospital of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0540-0770
Ioannis Varkarakis2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio General Hospital of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece.
Bhaskar K SomaniDepartment of Urology, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6248-6478
Lazaros Tzelves2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio General Hospital of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-4619-9783

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid increase in computer processing capacity over the past two decades, machine learning techniques have been applied in many sectors of daily life. Machine learning in therapeutic settings is also gaining popularity. We analysed current studies on machine learning in robotic urologic surgery. We searched PubMed/Medline and Google Scholar up to December 2023. Search terms included "urologic surgery", "artificial intelligence", "machine learning", "neural network", "automation", and "robotic surgery". Automatic preoperative imaging, intraoperative anatomy matching, and bleeding prediction has been a major focus. Early artificial intelligence (AI) therapeutic outcomes are promising. Robot-assisted surgery provides precise telemetry data and a cutting-edge viewing console to analyse and improve AI integration in surgery. Machine learning enhances surgical skill feedback, procedure effectiveness, surgical guidance, and postoperative prediction. Tension-sensors on robotic arms and augmented reality can improve surgery. This provides real-time organ motion monitoring, improving precision and accuracy. As datasets develop and electronic health records are used more and more, these technologies will become more effective and useful. AI in robotic surgery is intended to improve surgical training and experience. Both seek precision to improve surgical care. AI in ''master-slave'' robotic surgery offers the detailed, step-by-step examination of autonomous robotic treatments.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemachine learningrobotic surgeryurologic surgery

Identifiers

PMID38730727
PMCPMC11083167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.