ReviewCancers2024
Recent Advancement in Diagnosis of Biliary Tract Cancer through Pathological and Molecular Classifications.
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unveiling the molecular profile of adenosquamous gallbladder carcinoma: characterization of a Caucasian cohort.Histopathology · 2026Article
- Article
- High incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in end-stage renal disease patients in Taiwan: analysis of a nationwide database with molecular insight of aristolochic acid exposure.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Carbon dots in cancer therapy: a novel approach to targeted drug delivery and reduced toxicity in gallbladder cancer.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Review
- Survival outcomes and prognostic factors inFrontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Burden and trajectories of biliary tract malignancies in Taiwan from 1998 to 2022.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Precision medicine for advanced biliary tract cancer in China: current status and future perspectives.Frontiers of medicine · 2025Review
- Point-of-Care Testing and Biomarkers in Biliary Diseases: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Magnetic resonance imaging features of intrahepatic bile duct adenoma: a 10-year retrospective study.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Molecular and Pathological Heterogeneity of Synchronous Small and Large Duct Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma-A Case Series.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biliary tract cancers (BTCs), including intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal cholangiocarcinomas, as well as gallbladder cancer, are a diverse group of cancers that exhibit unique molecular characteristics in each of their anatomic and pathological subtypes. The pathological classification of BTCs compromises distinct growth patterns, including mass forming, periductal infiltrating, and intraductal growing types, which can be identified through gross examination. The small-duct and large-duct types of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma have been recently introduced into the WHO classification. The presentation of typical clinical symptoms, as well as the extensive utilization of radiological, endoscopic, and molecular diagnostic methods, is thoroughly detailed in the description. To overcome the limitations of traditional tissue acquisition methods, new diagnostic modalities are being explored. The treatment landscape is also rapidly evolving owing to the emergence of distinct subgroups with unique molecular alterations and corresponding targeted therapies. Furthermore, we emphasize the crucial aspects of diagnosing BTC in practical clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.