ReviewCancers2024
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Diagnostic and Prognostic Values of
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hepatic metastasis surveillance in uveal melanoma: a retrospective cohort study from a UK tertiary centre (2006-2022).British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted assessment of metabolic response to tebentafusp in metastatic uveal melanoma: a long axial field-of-view [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Intention-to-Treat Analysis of Hepatic Resection for Liver Metastases from Uveal Melanoma: A Single-Center Experience.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- GLUT-1-negative Choroidal Malignant Melanoma with Liver Metastasis Recurrence 12 Years after Surgery without FDG Accumulation in a Recurrent Lesion on FDG-PET/CT.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA-compliant), we tried to investigate diagnostic and prognostic values of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.